Kyle Hurth
Impact in
-
- Pituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments
- Toxicology top 10%
Papers in
- Genetics 9
- Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment 9
-
- Pituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments 9
- Co-authors
- Kathryn E. Carlson (2 shared papers)John A. Katzenellenbogen (2 shared papers)Anobel Tamrazi (2 shared papers)Gabriel Zada (19 shared papers)Matthew G. Gipson (1 shared paper)John D. Carmichael (9 shared papers)Kristopher W. Cummings (1 shared paper)Samuel Guzman (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- Journal of neurosurgery (3 papers)Operative Neurosurgery (3 papers)Neuro-Oncology Advances (2 papers)Otology & Neurotology (2 papers)Neurosurgery (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesBrazilUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Kyle Hurth
44 papers receiving 625 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 93
- Toxicology 20
- Genetics 124
- Genetics 44
- Neurology 61
Countries citing papers authored by Kyle Hurth
This map shows the geographic impact of Kyle Hurth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kyle Hurth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kyle Hurth more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kyle Hurth
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kyle Hurth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kyle Hurth. The network helps show where Kyle Hurth may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Kyle Hurth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 47 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2002 | 138 | |
| 2 | 2021 | 72 | |
| 3 | 2013 | 37 | |
| 4 | 2009 | 33 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 32 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 30 | |
| 7 | 2020 | 29 | |
| 8 | 2004 | 27 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 26 | |
| 10 | 2018 | 22 | |
| 11 | 2022 | 18 | |
| 12 | 2021 | 16 | |
| 13 | 2023 | 15 | |
| 14 | 2023 | 12 | |
| 15 | 2020 | 11 | |
| 16 | 1998 | 9 | |
| 17 | 2019 | 8 | |
| 18 | 2022 | 8 | |
| 19 | 2017 | 8 | |
| 20 | 2021 | 8 |
About Kyle Hurth
Kyle Hurth is a scholar working on Genetics, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Epidemiology, Molecular Biology and Neurology, having authored 47 papers that have together received 636 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments (9 papers), Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment (9 papers), Meningioma and schwannoma management (7 papers), Neuroblastoma Research and Treatments (2 papers), Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis (2 papers), Brain Metastases and Treatment (2 papers), Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers) and Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (93 citations), Toxicology (20 citations), Genetics (124 citations), Genetics (44 citations) and Neurology (61 citations). Kyle Hurth has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Brazil and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Kathryn E. Carlson, John A. Katzenellenbogen, Anobel Tamrazi, Gabriel Zada, Matthew G. Gipson, John D. Carmichael, Kristopher W. Cummings, Samuel Guzman, Mark S. Shiroishi and Helena C. Chui. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of neurosurgery, Operative Neurosurgery, Neuro-Oncology Advances, Otology & Neurotology and Neurosurgery.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.