Kyle Ferguson

20 papers receiving 276 citations

Peers

Kyle Ferguson
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
  • General Psychology 9
  • Health 38
  • Applied Psychology 18
  • Social Psychology 61
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 37
Replace Catherine Y. Read with:
Catherine Y. Read United States
Emily Nelson United States
Francisco Javier Labrador Encinas Spain
Justin M. Karter United States
Katherine Ottman United States
Mark Hochhauser United States
Julia Terry United Kingdom
Carla Raymondalexas Marchira Indonesia
Kit T. Y. Chan Hong Kong
Zorana Zupan United Kingdom
Kyle Ferguson relative to Catherine Y. Read United States Catherine Y. Read's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Catherine Y. Read · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kyle Ferguson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kyle Ferguson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kyle Ferguson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kyle Ferguson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kyle Ferguson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kyle Ferguson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kyle Ferguson. The network helps show where Kyle Ferguson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Kyle Ferguson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kyle Ferguson Line = papers co-authored together Kyle Ferguson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 201863
2 200332
3 202027
4 201827
5 201922
6 201818
7 202218
8 200617
9 201316
10 200316
11
Clinical Integration: The Promise and the Path.
20037
12 20206
13
Behavioral health as primary care: Beyond efficacy to effectiveness: A report of the Third Reno Conference on the Integration of Behavioral Health in Primary Care.
20036
14 20016
15 20154
16 20203
17 20103
18 20242
19 20211
20
Education for psychiatric clients and carers.
19911

About Kyle Ferguson

Kyle Ferguson is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Health, Social Psychology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 20 papers that have together received 295 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics in medical practice (4 papers), Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy (3 papers), Behavioral and Psychological Studies (2 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (2 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (2 papers), Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (1 paper), Health and Lifestyle Studies (1 paper) and Cognitive and psychological constructs research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (9 citations), Health (38 citations), Applied Psychology (18 citations), Social Psychology (61 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (37 citations). Kyle Ferguson has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Ireland and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include William O’Donohue, Arthur L. Caplan, Amy E. Naugle, Marie Murphy, Niamh Murphy, Catherine Woods, Alan Nevill, Ciarán MacDonncha, Angela Carlin and Weihsueh A. Chiu. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics, Journal of Medical Ethics, Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, The Behavior Analyst and CA A Cancer Journal for Clinicians.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact