Kyle Caspersen

23 papers receiving 969 citations

Peers

Kyle Caspersen
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
  • Geophysics 222
  • Condensed Matter Physics 101
  • Materials Chemistry 352
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 261
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 121
Replace Hugh F. Wilson with:
Hugh F. Wilson Australia
Inhyuk Nam South Korea
Ramon J. Ravelo United States
R. J. Trainor United States
Kevin P. Driver United States
Tommy Ao United States
Hironaru Murakami Japan
Parthapratim Biswas United States
Scott R. Bickham United States
M. van Thiel United States
Kyle Caspersen relative to Hugh F. Wilson Australia Hugh F. Wilson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8.4×
Hugh F. Wilson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kyle Caspersen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kyle Caspersen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kyle Caspersen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kyle Caspersen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kyle Caspersen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kyle Caspersen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kyle Caspersen. The network helps show where Kyle Caspersen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Kyle Caspersen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kyle Caspersen Line = papers co-authored together Kyle Caspersen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004141
2 2009121
3 200598
4 201387
5 200784
6 200772
7 200256
8 200054
9 200151
10 201939
11 200631
12 201828
13 200223
14 200522
15 200121
16 201216
17 202012
18 201711
19 202110
20 20216

About Kyle Caspersen

Kyle Caspersen is a scholar working on Geophysics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Condensed Matter Physics, Materials Chemistry and Computational Mechanics, having authored 23 papers that have together received 990 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include High-pressure geophysics and materials (8 papers), Surface and Thin Film Phenomena (8 papers), Fluid Dynamics and Thin Films (3 papers), Theoretical and Computational Physics (3 papers), Thermodynamic and Structural Properties of Metals and Alloys (2 papers), Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (2 papers), Boron and Carbon Nanomaterials Research (2 papers) and Shape Memory Alloy Transformations (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geophysics (222 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (101 citations), Materials Chemistry (352 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (261 citations) and Astronomy and Astrophysics (121 citations). Kyle Caspersen has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Emily A. Carter, Michael Ortiz, Adrián J. Lew, Miguel A. Morales, Sébastien Hamel, Eric Schwegler, James W. Evans, Patricia Ann Thiel, Conrad R. Stoldt and David M. Ceperley. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review Letters, Physical review. E, Physical review. B., Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Applied Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact