K.W. Hindmarsh

39 papers receiving 348 citations

Peers

K.W. Hindmarsh
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • Toxicology 42
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 31
  • Developmental Neuroscience 20
  • Pharmacology 43
  • Pharmacology 60
Replace Laurence Attolini with:
Laurence Attolini France
R. H. Cravey United States
Udo Boerner United States
A. Hutchings United Kingdom
Volker Auwaerter Germany
Emil R. Smith United States
J. A. Watt Australia
M. G. Bogaert Belgium
Τ. Nagata Japan
R J Royer France
K.W. Hindmarsh relative to Laurence Attolini France Laurence Attolini's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Laurence Attolini · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by K.W. Hindmarsh

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of K.W. Hindmarsh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by K.W. Hindmarsh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites K.W. Hindmarsh more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by K.W. Hindmarsh

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by K.W. Hindmarsh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by K.W. Hindmarsh. The network helps show where K.W. Hindmarsh may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside K.W. Hindmarsh, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with K.W. Hindmarsh Line = papers co-authored together K.W. Hindmarsh links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200238
2 198630
3 198327
4
Chloral hydrate sedation in neonates and infants--clinical and pharmacologic considerations.
198927
5 197627
6 198325
7 199022
8
Diurnal rhythms of cortisol, ACTH, and beta-endorphin levels in neonates and adults.
198917
9 198614
10 197713
11 198312
12 198412
13 199412
14 197612
15 19789
16 20198
17 19818
18 19807
19 19775
20 19905

About K.W. Hindmarsh

K.W. Hindmarsh is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Endocrine and Autonomic Systems and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, having authored 43 papers that have together received 373 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (11 papers), Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy (10 papers), Neuroscience of respiration and sleep (8 papers), Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (6 papers), Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (5 papers), Neonatal Health and Biochemistry (5 papers), Renal function and acid-base balance (5 papers) and Hyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patients (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Toxicology (42 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (31 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (20 citations), Pharmacology (43 citations) and Pharmacology (60 citations). K.W. Hindmarsh has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Sylvia M. Wallace, Dennis K.J. Gorecki, Koravangattu Sankaran, Nadège Hamon, Frank J. Burczynski, K Sankaran, K.K. Midha, Donald F. LeGatt, G. L. Williams and Jonathan R. Dimmock. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Pediatric Research, European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, American Journal of Perinatology and Journal of Analytical Toxicology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact