K.W. Bögl

25 papers receiving 284 citations

Peers

K.W. Bögl
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Food Science 236
  • Biotechnology 49
  • Analytical Chemistry 46
  • Animal Science and Zoology 44
  • Plant Science 101
Replace F.J. Ley with:
F.J. Ley United Kingdom
Barbara Birzele Germany
Hyun Ee Ok South Korea
Luzia Shundo Brazil
O. L. Brekke United States
Brendan Curran United Kingdom
STIG B. LOMHOLT United Kingdom
Michael R. Boersig United States
Karl‐Heinz Engel Germany
Markéta Pospíchalová Czechia
K.W. Bögl relative to F.J. Ley United Kingdom F.J. Ley's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
F.J. Ley · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by K.W. Bögl

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of K.W. Bögl's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by K.W. Bögl with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites K.W. Bögl more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by K.W. Bögl

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by K.W. Bögl. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by K.W. Bögl. The network helps show where K.W. Bögl may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside K.W. Bögl, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with K.W. Bögl Line = papers co-authored together K.W. Bögl links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199232
2 199430
3 199429
4 198926
5 199523
6 199323
7 199021
8 200219
9 199517
10
Luminescence techniques to identify the treatment of foods by ionizing radiation.
199316
11 199014
12 199014
13 198914
14 199914
15 199410
16
Concerted action of the Community Bureau of Reference on methods of identification of irradiated foods
19938
17 20018
18 19945
19 19925
20
Elektronen-Spin-Resonanz-Spektroskopie an Gewürzproben : nachweis einer behandlung mit ionisierenden strahlen
19924

About K.W. Bögl

K.W. Bögl is a scholar working on Food Science, Animal Science and Zoology, Plant Science, Biomedical Engineering and Biotechnology, having authored 26 papers that have together received 341 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Radiation Effects and Dosimetry (14 papers), Meat and Animal Product Quality (6 papers), Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (3 papers), Food Quality and Safety Studies (3 papers), Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management (2 papers), Isotope Analysis in Ecology (2 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (2 papers) and Listeria monocytogenes in Food Safety (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Food Science (236 citations), Biotechnology (49 citations), Analytical Chemistry (46 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (44 citations) and Plant Science (101 citations). K.W. Bögl has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Austria and Egypt. Frequent co-authors include Georg Schreiber, N. Helle, Bernd Linke, Axel Hoffmann, Michael Nüsse, Wolfgang Beisker, M. Bauchinger, Herbert Braselmann, Jutta Zagon and Hermann Broll. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Radiation Biology, European Food Research and Technology, Nuklearmedizin - NuclearMedicine, Radiation Physics and Chemistry and Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact