Klaus Epstein

989 citations
40 papers · 474 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Klaus Epstein

29 papers receiving 247 citations

Peers

Klaus Epstein
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • History 131
  • History and Philosophy of Science 45
  • Political Science and International Relations 220
  • General Psychology 11
  • Philosophy 76
Replace Frederick B. Artz with:
Frederick B. Artz United States
Ernest Campbell Mossner United Kingdom
Lester G. Crocker United States
Mary Peter Mack United States
Julia Stapleton United Kingdom
Bernard M. G. Reardon United Kingdom
Douglas Bush United States
Denys Hay United Kingdom
Bruce L. Kinzer Canada
Laurence Dickey United States
Klaus Epstein relative to Frederick B. Artz United States Frederick B. Artz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×
Frederick B. Artz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Klaus Epstein

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Klaus Epstein's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Klaus Epstein with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Klaus Epstein more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Klaus Epstein

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Klaus Epstein. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Klaus Epstein. The network helps show where Klaus Epstein may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Klaus Epstein, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Klaus Epstein Line = papers co-authored together Klaus Epstein links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1960145
2 1967106
3 196235
4 196035
5 196730
6 196218
7 196715
8 196810
9 196310
10 20159
11 20126
12
Matthias Erzberger und das Dilemma der deutschen Demokratie
19625
13 19665
14 19614
15 19624
16 19594
17 19643
18 19593
19 19943
20 19633

About Klaus Epstein

Klaus Epstein is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, History, Sociology and Political Science, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and General Health Professions, having authored 40 papers that have together received 474 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include European history and politics (11 papers), European Political History Analysis (4 papers), Health and Medical Research Impacts (3 papers), Italian Fascism and Post-war Society (3 papers), Health Sciences Research and Education (2 papers), Central European and Russian historical studies (1 paper), Archaeological Research and Protection (1 paper) and Historical Influence and Diplomacy (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History (131 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (45 citations), Political Science and International Relations (220 citations), General Psychology (11 citations) and Philosophy (76 citations). Klaus Epstein has collaborated with scholars based in United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Wolfgang J. Mommsen, Klemens von Klemperer, Carl E. Schorske, Fritz Stern, Robert Spencer, Peter Paret, Hans–Ulrich Wehler, Sidney B. Fay, J. Bantly and R. E. Lanou. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, World Politics, History and Theory, The Journal of Modern History and BMJ.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact