Julia Stapleton
Impact in
- History top 2%
- Philosophy, History, and Historiography
- European Political History Analysis
- Historical Studies of British Isles
-
- Political Theory and Influence
- Political and Economic history of UK and US
- Political Science Research and Education
Papers in
-
- Political Theory and Influence 14
- Political and Economic history of UK and US 10
- History 11
- Philosophy, History, and Historiography 8
- Cultural History and Identity Formation 2
- Historical Studies of British Isles 2
Julia Stapleton
24 papers receiving 194 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
- History 79
- Political Science and International Relations 132
- General Psychology 4
- Philosophy 30
- Sociology and Political Science 73
Countries citing papers authored by Julia Stapleton
This map shows the geographic impact of Julia Stapleton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julia Stapleton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julia Stapleton more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Julia Stapleton
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julia Stapleton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julia Stapleton. The network helps show where Julia Stapleton may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 2 scholars most cited alongside Julia Stapleton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1994 | 82 | |
| 2 | 2001 | 59 | |
| 3 | 2005 | 22 | |
| 4 | Sir Arthur Bryant and national history in twentieth-century Britain | 2005 | 21 |
| 5 | Englishness and the Study of Politics: The Social and Political Thought of Ernest Barker | 1994 | 18 |
| 6 | 1999 | 12 | |
| 7 | Group rights : perspectives since 1900 | 1995 | 9 |
| 8 | Dicey and his legacy | 1995 | 9 |
| 9 | 2000 | 9 | |
| 10 | 1999 | 5 | |
| 11 | 2007 | 5 | |
| 12 | 1991 | 4 | |
| 13 | 1989 | 3 | |
| 14 | Liberalism, democracy, and the state in Britain : five essays, 1862-1891 | 1997 | 3 |
| 15 | 1999 | 3 | |
| 16 | 2008 | 3 | |
| 17 | Christianity, Patriotism, and Nationhood: The England of G.K. Chesterton | 2009 | 3 |
| 18 | 2000 | 2 | |
| 19 | 2006 | 2 | |
| 20 | 1994 | 1 |
About Julia Stapleton
Julia Stapleton is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, History, Literature and Literary Theory, Philosophy and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 33 papers that have together received 284 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Political Theory and Influence (14 papers), Political and Economic history of UK and US (10 papers), Philosophy, History, and Historiography (8 papers), Evelyn Waugh and Hans Urs von Balthasar Studies (5 papers), Religion and Society Interactions (3 papers), European Cultural and National Identity (2 papers), Cultural History and Identity Formation (2 papers) and Historical Studies of British Isles (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History (79 citations), Political Science and International Relations (132 citations), General Psychology (4 citations), Philosophy (30 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (73 citations). Julia Stapleton has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include G. K. Chesterton and Thomas William Heyck. Their work appears in journals such as The Historical Journal, The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, The American Historical Review, History of European Ideas and Journal of the History of Ideas.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.