Kim Piper
Impact in
- Otorhinolaryngology top 5%
- Head and Neck Cancer Studies
- Oncology top 10%
- Cancer Cells and Metastasis
- Bone health and treatments
Papers in
- Surgery 7
- Head and Neck Surgical Oncology 3
- Salivary Gland Tumors Diagnosis and Treatment 2
-
- Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment 4
- Co-authors
- Farida Fortune (4 shared papers)A. Boyde (1 shared paper)Ian C. Mackenzie (2 shared papers)Lisa J. Harper (1 shared paper)John Common (1 shared paper)Ian R. Hart (2 shared papers)Gareth J. Thomas (2 shared papers)John F. Marshall (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The Journal of Pathology (2 papers)Head & Neck (2 papers)International Review of Psychiatry (2 papers)British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (2 papers)Journal of Biomedical Optics (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesRussia
In The Last Decade
Kim Piper
24 papers receiving 887 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
- Otorhinolaryngology 100
- Oncology 360
- Periodontics 50
- Oral Surgery 78
- Cancer Research 152
Countries citing papers authored by Kim Piper
This map shows the geographic impact of Kim Piper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kim Piper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kim Piper more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kim Piper
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kim Piper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kim Piper. The network helps show where Kim Piper may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Kim Piper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2010 | 249 | |
| 2 | 2007 | 157 | |
| 3 | 1992 | 104 | |
| 4 | 2014 | 103 | |
| 5 | 2012 | 49 | |
| 6 | 2014 | 44 | |
| 7 | 2007 | 35 | |
| 8 | 2011 | 35 | |
| 9 | 2010 | 34 | |
| 10 | 2006 | 25 | |
| 11 | 2008 | 13 | |
| 12 | 2009 | 12 | |
| 13 | 1998 | 11 | |
| 14 | 2012 | 6 | |
| 15 | 2023 | 6 | |
| 16 | 2005 | 5 | |
| 17 | 2015 | 5 | |
| 18 | 2004 | 4 | |
| 19 | 2012 | 4 | |
| 20 | 2023 | 2 |
About Kim Piper
Kim Piper is a scholar working on Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Oncology, Rheumatology and Oral Surgery, having authored 26 papers that have together received 907 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology (4 papers), Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment (4 papers), Head and Neck Surgical Oncology (3 papers), Bone Tumor Diagnosis and Treatments (3 papers), Cancer Cells and Metastasis (2 papers), Salivary Gland Tumors Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (2 papers) and Optical Coherence Tomography Applications (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Otorhinolaryngology (100 citations), Oncology (360 citations), Periodontics (50 citations), Oral Surgery (78 citations) and Cancer Research (152 citations). Kim Piper has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Farida Fortune, A. Boyde, Ian C. Mackenzie, Lisa J. Harper, John Common, Ian R. Hart, Gareth J. Thomas, John F. Marshall, Daniel Marsh and Waseem Jerjes. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Pathology, Head & Neck, International Review of Psychiatry, British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Journal of Biomedical Optics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.