Kim Bennett
Impact in
- Research and Theory top 2%
- Nursing education and management
- Leadership and Management top 1%
Papers in
-
- Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout 2
- Health Sciences Research and Education 1
- Health, psychology, and well-being 1
- Virology 3
- Rabies epidemiology and control 3
- Co-authors
- Philip Burnard (2 shared papers)Deborah Edwards (2 shared papers)Dennis M. Donovan (3 shared papers)Andrew Silver (3 shared papers)Mike Allan (3 shared papers)Rick Rosatte (3 shared papers)Chris Davies (3 shared papers)Alex Wandeler (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Wildlife Diseases (3 papers)Nurse Education Today (2 papers)Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing (1 paper)Advances in Social Work (1 paper)Nursing Standard (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited KingdomMalta
In The Last Decade
Kim Bennett
8 papers receiving 526 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
- Research and Theory 69
- Leadership and Management 51
- Virology 138
- Microbiology 71
- Clinical Psychology 233
Countries citing papers authored by Kim Bennett
This map shows the geographic impact of Kim Bennett's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kim Bennett with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kim Bennett more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kim Bennett
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kim Bennett. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kim Bennett. The network helps show where Kim Bennett may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 21 scholars most cited alongside Kim Bennett, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2009 | 256 | |
| 2 | 2007 | 112 | |
| 3 | 2001 | 95 | |
| 4 | 2006 | 43 | |
| 5 | 2007 | 42 | |
| 6 | 2017 | 10 | |
| 7 | 1994 | 8 | |
| 8 | 1990 | 1 |
About Kim Bennett
Kim Bennett is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Virology, Microbiology, Clinical Psychology and Occupational Therapy, having authored 8 papers that have together received 567 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Rabies epidemiology and control (3 papers), Microbial infections and disease research (3 papers), Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (2 papers), Health Sciences Research and Education (1 paper), Yersinia bacterium, plague, ectoparasites research (1 paper), Health, psychology, and well-being (1 paper), Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (1 paper) and Nursing education and management (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (69 citations), Leadership and Management (51 citations), Virology (138 citations), Microbiology (71 citations) and Clinical Psychology (233 citations). Kim Bennett has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United Kingdom and Malta. Frequent co-authors include Philip Burnard, Deborah Edwards, Dennis M. Donovan, Andrew Silver, Mike Allan, Rick Rosatte, Chris Davies, Alex Wandeler, Donia Baldacchino and Valérie Tóthová. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Wildlife Diseases, Nurse Education Today, Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing, Advances in Social Work and Nursing Standard.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.