K.‐H. Graefe

1.9k citations
58 papers · 1.7k · h-index 22

Impact in

Papers in

K.‐H. Graefe

57 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

K.‐H. Graefe
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 985
  • Pharmacology 264
  • Molecular Biology 732
  • Pharmacology 135
  • Biochemistry 47
Replace Walter Osswald with:
Walter Osswald Portugal
Stella R. O’Donnell Australia
Jerry G. Webb United States
Aron Jurkiewicz Brazil
Aaron D. Freedman United States
S. J. H. Ashcroft United Kingdom
Conrad L. Cowan United States
Toshio Kaneko Japan
G. Kroneberg Germany
John P. McAuliff
K.‐H. Graefe relative to Walter Osswald Portugal Walter Osswald's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.4×
Walter Osswald · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by K.‐H. Graefe

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of K.‐H. Graefe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by K.‐H. Graefe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites K.‐H. Graefe more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by K.‐H. Graefe

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by K.‐H. Graefe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by K.‐H. Graefe. The network helps show where K.‐H. Graefe may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside K.‐H. Graefe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with K.‐H. Graefe Line = papers co-authored together K.‐H. Graefe links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 58 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1973324
2 1984139
3 1988126
4 197485
5 197984
6 197957
7 198350
8 197146
9 197144
10 198140
11 199137
12 197835
13 197834
14 198333
15 198933
16 197931
17 197729
18 198626
19 199026
20 197725

About K.‐H. Graefe

K.‐H. Graefe is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Pharmacology, Molecular Biology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Biochemistry, having authored 58 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (39 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (27 papers), Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (17 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (13 papers), Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies (12 papers), Ion Transport and Channel Regulation (8 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (6 papers) and Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (985 citations), Pharmacology (264 citations), Molecular Biology (732 citations), Pharmacology (135 citations) and Biochemistry (47 citations). K.‐H. Graefe has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Argentina and United States. Frequent co-authors include ULLRICH TRENDELENBURG, F. J. E. Stefano, Salomón Z. Langer, Heinz Bönisch, H. B�nisch, M. Henseling, Bernhard U. Keller, Winfried Wingender, P. Schacht and Dieter Beermann. Their work appears in journals such as Naunyn-Schmiedeberg s Archives of Pharmacology, European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, Pharmacological Reviews, American Journal of Nephrology and Hypertension.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact