Kfir Asraf

28 papers receiving 646 citations

Kfir Asraf's Hit Papers

ChatGPT outperforms humans in emotional awareness evaluations 2023 · 192 citations
1920+1+2Years since publication50100150

Peers

Kfir Asraf
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
  • Health Informatics 72
  • Applied Psychology 66
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 143
  • Biological Psychiatry 25
  • Clinical Psychology 111
Replace Julia Bondar with:
Julia Bondar United States
Matteo Malgaroli United States
Michael V. Heinz United States
María Luisa Barrigón Spain
Adela C. Timmons United States
Alexis Bourla France
Kim Bullock United States
Noomen Guelmami Tunisia
Laura Dellazizzo Canada
Yang S. Liu Canada
Kfir Asraf relative to Julia Bondar United States Julia Bondar's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Julia Bondar · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kfir Asraf

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kfir Asraf's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kfir Asraf with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kfir Asraf more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kfir Asraf

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kfir Asraf. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kfir Asraf. The network helps show where Kfir Asraf may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Kfir Asraf, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kfir Asraf Line = papers co-authored together Kfir Asraf links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
ChatGPT outperforms humans in emotional awareness evaluations
Hit paper breakdown →
2023192
2 202371
3 202068
4 202156
5 202254
6 202139
7 202225
8 202419
9 202116
10 202215
11 202112
12 202210
13 20229
14 20248
15 20238
16 20218
17 20207
18 20246
19 20206
20 20195

About Kfir Asraf

Kfir Asraf is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Molecular Biology, having authored 30 papers that have together received 656 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sleep and related disorders (10 papers), COVID-19 and Mental Health (5 papers), Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (5 papers), Sleep and Wakefulness Research (4 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (3 papers), Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention (3 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (2 papers) and Gut microbiota and health (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (72 citations), Applied Psychology (66 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (143 citations), Biological Psychiatry (25 citations) and Clinical Psychology (111 citations). Kfir Asraf has collaborated with scholars based in Israel, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Dorit Hadar‐Shoval, Zohar Elyoseph, Iris Haimov, Maayan Agmon, Liat Tikotzky, Tamar Shochat, Snait Tamir, Faiga Magzal, Orna Tzischinsky and Mary Jo Coiro. Their work appears in journals such as Scientific Reports, Sleep Medicine, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Nature and Science of Sleep and Journal of Attention Disorders.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact