Efrat Gil

20 papers receiving 333 citations

Peers

Efrat Gil
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 89
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 30
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 24
  • Rehabilitation 12
  • Emergency Medicine 15
Replace Rosanne van Seben with:
Rosanne van Seben Netherlands
Sue Kurrle Australia
Lucienne A. Reichardt Netherlands
Aine M. Ní Mhaoláin Ireland
Leonie Robson Australia
Carmen Luz Muñoz-Mendoza Spain
Daniel Rexroth United States
Deborah Perry Schoenfelder United States
Theresa A. Floegel United States
Paige Moorhouse Canada
Efrat Gil relative to Rosanne van Seben Netherlands Rosanne van Seben's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.4×
Rosanne van Seben · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Efrat Gil

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Efrat Gil's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Efrat Gil with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Efrat Gil more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Efrat Gil

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Efrat Gil. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Efrat Gil. The network helps show where Efrat Gil may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Efrat Gil, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Efrat Gil Line = papers co-authored together Efrat Gil links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201687
2 201964
3 201858
4
Use of Physical Restraints in a General Hospital: a Cross-Sectional Observational Study.
201525
5 201718
6 202113
7 202212
8 202011
9 20249
10 20228
11 20208
12 20025
13 20165
14 20215
15 20214
16 20224
17 20233
18 20222
19 20231
20 20221

About Efrat Gil

Efrat Gil is a scholar working on Geriatrics and Gerontology, Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Emergency Medicine and General Health Professions, having authored 22 papers that have together received 343 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Frailty in Older Adults (5 papers), Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention (3 papers), Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (3 papers), Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (1 paper), Health Education and Validation (1 paper), Chronic Disease Management Strategies (1 paper), Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (1 paper) and Emergency and Acute Care Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (89 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (30 citations), Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (24 citations), Rehabilitation (12 citations) and Emergency Medicine (15 citations). Efrat Gil has collaborated with scholars based in Israel, Denmark and United States. Frequent co-authors include Maayan Agmon, Anna Zisberg, Debbie Rand, Nurit Gur‐Yaish, Efrat Wolfovitz, Kfir Asraf, Rachel Kizony, Ayal Hirsch, Tal Krasovsky and Iris Haimov. Their work appears in journals such as BMC Geriatrics, Journal of Clinical Nursing, The Journals of Gerontology Series A, Age and Ageing and GeroScience.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact