Kenneth E. Bruscia

2.1k citations
28 papers · 1.3k · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Kenneth E. Bruscia

28 papers receiving 895 citations

Peers

Kenneth E. Bruscia
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Music 444
  • Social Psychology 966
  • Conservation 144
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 584
  • Clinical Psychology 310
Replace Brynjulf Stige with:
Brynjulf Stige Norway
Randi Rolvsjord Norway
Lars Ole Bonde Denmark
Barbara L. Wheeler United States
Monika Geretsegger Norway
Robert E. Krout United States
Martina de Witte Netherlands
Saoirse Finn United Kingdom
Lori F. Gooding United States
Vicky Karkou United Kingdom
Kenneth E. Bruscia relative to Brynjulf Stige Norway Brynjulf Stige's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Brynjulf Stige · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kenneth E. Bruscia

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kenneth E. Bruscia's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kenneth E. Bruscia with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kenneth E. Bruscia more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kenneth E. Bruscia

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kenneth E. Bruscia. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kenneth E. Bruscia. The network helps show where Kenneth E. Bruscia may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 2 scholars most cited alongside Kenneth E. Bruscia, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kenneth E. Bruscia Line = papers co-authored together Kenneth E. Bruscia links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Defining Music Therapy
1989441
2
Improvisational Models of Music Therapy
1987264
3 1995135
4
The Dynamics of Music Psychotherapy
1998121
5
Guided imagery and music : the Bonny method and beyond
2002109
6 198827
7 199827
8 200818
9 198815
10 200113
11 200910
12 20089
13
Methods of teaching and training the music therapist
19889
14 19898
15 20007
16 19897
17 19816
18
Perspectives on music therapy education and training
19876
19
Modelos de improvisación en musicoterapia
19996
20 19866

About Kenneth E. Bruscia

Kenneth E. Bruscia is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Music, Rehabilitation, Cognitive Neuroscience and General Health Professions, having authored 28 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Music Therapy and Health (19 papers), Diverse Music Education Insights (9 papers), Musicians’ Health and Performance (4 papers), Neuroscience and Music Perception (4 papers), Health, psychology, and well-being (3 papers), Art Therapy and Mental Health (3 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (2 papers) and Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Music (444 citations), Social Psychology (966 citations), Conservation (144 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (584 citations) and Clinical Psychology (310 citations). Kenneth E. Bruscia has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Carol A. Prickett and Cheryl Dileo. Their work appears in journals such as The Arts in Psychotherapy, Music Therapy Perspectives, Notes, Journal of Health Psychology and Nordic Journal of Music Therapy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact