Music Therapy Perspectives

753 papers and 5.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 753 papers published in Music Therapy Perspectives in the last decades have received a total of 5.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Music Therapy Perspectives usually cover Social Psychology (595 papers), Music (320 papers) and Cognitive Neuroscience (255 papers) specifically the topics of Music Therapy and Health (583 papers), Diverse Music Education Insights (310 papers) and Neuroscience and Music Perception (213 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Music Therapy Perspectives are J. M. Standley, Michael J. Silverman, Felicity A. Baker, Sheri L. Robb, Michael H. Thaut, Robert E. Krout, Susan Hadley, Kenneth Aigen, Tony Wigram and Kate Gfeller.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Music Therapy Perspectives

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Music Therapy Perspectives. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Music Therapy Perspectives.

Countries where authors publish in Music Therapy Perspectives

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Music Therapy Perspectives. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Music Therapy Perspectives with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Music Therapy Perspectives more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025