Kenneth D. Hapner

22 papers receiving 489 citations

Peers

Kenneth D. Hapner
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Cell Biology 191
  • Insect Science 72
  • Immunology 117
  • Molecular Biology 314
  • Biophysics 21
Replace Henk J. Bak with:
Henk J. Bak Netherlands
James A. Mackintosh Australia
Eugenia M. Clérico United States
Gérard Batelier France
J Claude Pernollet France
Walter SCHARTAU Germany
Shinji Sueda Japan
William McCormick United States
Dominick Pallotta Canada
Jacqueline Nairn United Kingdom
Kenneth D. Hapner relative to Henk J. Bak Netherlands Henk J. Bak's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.2×
Henk J. Bak · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kenneth D. Hapner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kenneth D. Hapner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kenneth D. Hapner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kenneth D. Hapner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kenneth D. Hapner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kenneth D. Hapner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kenneth D. Hapner. The network helps show where Kenneth D. Hapner may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside Kenneth D. Hapner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kenneth D. Hapner Line = papers co-authored together Kenneth D. Hapner links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1968185
2 196842
3 197841
4 198131
5 198528
6 197028
7 198425
8 198224
9 196623
10 197917
11 198916
12 199316
13 198314
14 200113
15 197512
16 197611
17 197811
18 198810
19 19846
20 19745

About Kenneth D. Hapner

Kenneth D. Hapner is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Epidemiology, Plant Science, Cell Biology and Immunology, having authored 23 papers that have together received 564 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Trypanosoma species research and implications (6 papers), Invertebrate Immune Response Mechanisms (3 papers), Hemoglobin structure and function (3 papers), Insect Resistance and Genetics (3 papers), Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity (2 papers), Hemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders (2 papers), Toxin Mechanisms and Immunotoxins (2 papers) and Spaceflight effects on biology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cell Biology (191 citations), Insect Science (72 citations), Immunology (117 citations), Molecular Biology (314 citations) and Biophysics (21 citations). Kenneth D. Hapner has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and France. Frequent co-authors include Frank R.N. Gurd, Charles R. Hartzell, Ralph Bradshaw, M. A. Jermyn, Gary A. Strobel, M. R. Stebbins, Philip E. Wilcox, John E. Robbins, Russell A. Jurenka and Michael McNeil. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Insect Physiology, Biochemistry, Journal of Biological Chemistry, Analytical Biochemistry and Annals of Botany.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact