Keith Sharp

540 citations
17 papers · 363 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Keith Sharp

17 papers receiving 312 citations

Peers

Keith Sharp
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Research and Theory 44
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 26
  • General Health Professions 68
  • Safety Research 37
  • Sociology and Political Science 118
Replace Sara Kathleen Geale with:
Sara Kathleen Geale Australia
Martin Lipscomb United Kingdom
Ann Therese Lotherington Norway
Sarah Wise Australia
John P. Gass United Kingdom
Hazel Platzer United Kingdom
Jess Dillard‐Wright United States
Hend Abdu Alnajjar Saudi Arabia
Kåre Heggen Norway
Loretta Bellman United Kingdom
Keith Sharp relative to Sara Kathleen Geale Australia Sara Kathleen Geale's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.4×
Sara Kathleen Geale · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Keith Sharp

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Keith Sharp's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Keith Sharp with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Keith Sharp more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Keith Sharp

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Keith Sharp. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Keith Sharp. The network helps show where Keith Sharp may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 4 scholars most cited alongside Keith Sharp, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Keith Sharp Line = papers co-authored together Keith Sharp links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 199892
2 199853
3
Sex in Cyberspace: Men Who Pay For Sex
200739
4 201233
5 199427
6 200027
7 200225
8 199517
9 201715
10 201211
11 19969
12 20004
13
Sex on the net: online relations between the men who pay for sex
20084
14 20133
15 19922
16 19941
17 20161

About Keith Sharp

Keith Sharp is a scholar working on Research and Theory, Safety Research, Sociology and Political Science, Education and Issues, ethics and legal aspects, having authored 17 papers that have together received 363 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sex work and related issues (5 papers), Nursing education and management (3 papers), Disability Education and Employment (2 papers), Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies (2 papers), Qualitative Research Methods and Applications (2 papers), Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies (1 paper), Educational Research and Methods (1 paper) and Gender Studies in Language (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (44 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (26 citations), General Health Professions (68 citations), Safety Research (37 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (118 citations). Keith Sharp has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Sarah Earle, Julius Sim, Yvonne Jewkes and Christopher Andrew Winch. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Advanced Nursing, Disability & Society, Studies in Higher Education, Sociology and Nurse Education Today.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact