Jess Dillard‐Wright

573 citations
30 papers · 309 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Jess Dillard‐Wright

27 papers receiving 303 citations

Peers

Jess Dillard‐Wright
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 32
  • Research and Theory 18
  • Health Informatics 17
  • Cultural Studies 39
  • General Health Professions 100
Replace Jane Robinson with:
Jane Robinson United Kingdom
Paddy Rodney Canada
Anne H. Bishop United States
DIANE HAMILTON United States
Susan Luparell United States
Cindy Kerber United States
Amara Sundus Canada
Liisa Koskinen Finland
Lesley M. Smith Canada
Denise K. Gormley United States
Jess Dillard‐Wright relative to Jane Robinson United Kingdom Jane Robinson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×29.5×
Jane Robinson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jess Dillard‐Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jess Dillard‐Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jess Dillard‐Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jess Dillard‐Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jess Dillard‐Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jess Dillard‐Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jess Dillard‐Wright. The network helps show where Jess Dillard‐Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Jess Dillard‐Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jess Dillard‐Wright Line = papers co-authored together Jess Dillard‐Wright links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202043
2 202135
3 202129
4 201927
5 202321
6 201917
7 202113
8 202312
9 202211
10 202211
11 202210
12 20219
13 20238
14 20238
15 20237
16 20237
17 20236
18 20246
19 20235
20 20235

About Jess Dillard‐Wright

Jess Dillard‐Wright is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology, Cultural Studies and Issues, ethics and legal aspects, having authored 30 papers that have together received 309 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics in medical practice (6 papers), Posthumanist Ethics and Activism (5 papers), Nursing education and management (4 papers), Nursing Education, Practice, and Leadership (4 papers), Disaster Response and Management (4 papers), Cultural Competency in Health Care (2 papers), Healthcare Systems and Challenges (2 papers) and Homelessness and Social Issues (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Issues, ethics and legal aspects (32 citations), Research and Theory (18 citations), Health Informatics (17 citations), Cultural Studies (39 citations) and General Health Professions (100 citations). Jess Dillard‐Wright has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Shena Gazaway, Rae Walker, Ryan Essex, Amélie Perron, Janice Gullick, Tiffany G. Townsend, Chelsea Derlan Williams, Jordon D. Bosse, Kaprea F. Johnson and Sarah Richardson. Their work appears in journals such as Nursing Philosophy, Nursing Inquiry, Advances in Nursing Science, Nursing Outlook and Journal of Nursing Education.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact