Keith Roe
Impact in
- Communication top 1%
- Social Media and Politics
- Media Studies and Communication
- Music top 1%
- Diverse Music Education Insights
Papers in
-
- Social Media and Politics 13
- Media Studies and Communication 6
-
- Impact of Technology on Adolescents 19
- Co-authors
- Mariek Vanden Abeele (9 shared papers)Kathleen Beullens (9 shared papers)Agnetha Broos (3 shared papers)Jan Van den Bulck (11 shared papers)Daniël Muijs (1 shared paper)Steven Eggermont (4 shared papers)Frederick Williams (1 shared paper)Scott W. Campbell (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Communications (15 papers)European Journal of Communication (6 papers)Poetics (3 papers)Journal of Children and Media (3 papers)Media Psychology (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- BelgiumNetherlandsUnited States
In The Last Decade
Keith Roe
74 papers receiving 1.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
- Communication 394
- Music 158
- Gender Studies 292
- Sociology and Political Science 810
- Literature and Literary Theory 201
Countries citing papers authored by Keith Roe
This map shows the geographic impact of Keith Roe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Keith Roe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Keith Roe more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Keith Roe
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Keith Roe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Keith Roe. The network helps show where Keith Roe may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Keith Roe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 79 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Young people and the new media. | 1986 | 177 |
| 2 | 2014 | 116 | |
| 3 | 1985 | 106 | |
| 4 | 2006 | 95 | |
| 5 | 1998 | 95 | |
| 6 | 2013 | 83 | |
| 7 | 2012 | 73 | |
| 8 | 1995 | 69 | |
| 9 | 1984 | 65 | |
| 10 | 2010 | 64 | |
| 11 | 2002 | 63 | |
| 12 | 2010 | 51 | |
| 13 | 2011 | 37 | |
| 14 | 1984 | 36 | |
| 15 | 1992 | 30 | |
| 16 | Popular music research | 1990 | 26 |
| 17 | 2011 | 26 | |
| 18 | 2000 | 24 | |
| 19 | 2008 | 24 | |
| 20 | 1998 | 21 |
About Keith Roe
Keith Roe is a scholar working on Communication, Sociology and Political Science, Literature and Literary Theory, Music and Gender Studies, having authored 79 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Impact of Technology on Adolescents (19 papers), Social Media and Politics (13 papers), Child Development and Digital Technology (12 papers), Media Influence and Health (10 papers), Media Studies and Communication (6 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (5 papers), Music History and Culture (5 papers) and Diverse Music Education Insights (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (394 citations), Music (158 citations), Gender Studies (292 citations), Sociology and Political Science (810 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (201 citations). Keith Roe has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, Netherlands and United States. Frequent co-authors include Mariek Vanden Abeele, Kathleen Beullens, Agnetha Broos, Jan Van den Bulck, Daniël Muijs, Steven Eggermont, Frederick Williams, Scott W. Campbell, Leen d’Haenens and Mario Pandelaere. Their work appears in journals such as Communications, European Journal of Communication, Poetics, Journal of Children and Media and Media Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.