Frederick Williams

76 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Frederick Williams
Comparison fields: 5 of 143
  • Linguistics and Language 344
  • Communication 236
  • Language and Linguistics 344
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 224
  • Literature and Literary Theory 183
Replace Benjamin Lee Whorf with:
Benjamin Lee Whorf Netherlands
Harvey J. Graff United States
Donald G. Ellis United States
Elizabeth Useem United States
A. M. Halpern
Deirdre Boden United States
Andrew Burn United Kingdom
Stuart Chase
Albert Séchehaye
Justus Buchler United States
Frederick Williams relative to Benjamin Lee Whorf Netherlands Benjamin Lee Whorf's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Benjamin Lee Whorf · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Frederick Williams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frederick Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frederick Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frederick Williams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frederick Williams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frederick Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frederick Williams. The network helps show where Frederick Williams may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Frederick Williams, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Frederick Williams Line = papers co-authored together Frederick Williams links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 88 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Research methods and the new media
1988284
2 196894
3
Reasoning With Statistics: How To Read Quantitative Research
198687
4 197283
5
Reasoning with statistics
197965
6 198462
7 197160
8 197359
9
Electronic Byways: State Policies for Rural Development Through Telecommunications
199259
10 197853
11 197247
12 196946
13 196546
14 197044
15 198343
16 197132
17 198131
18 196529
19 197926
20 197125

About Frederick Williams

Frederick Williams is a scholar working on Language and Linguistics, Linguistics and Language, Anthropology, Literature and Literary Theory and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 88 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Classical Antiquity Studies (10 papers), Multilingual Education and Policy (10 papers), Linguistic Variation and Morphology (10 papers), Phonetics and Phonology Research (6 papers), EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning (6 papers), Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (4 papers), Organic Chemistry Synthesis Methods (4 papers) and Second Language Learning and Teaching (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Linguistics and Language (344 citations), Communication (236 citations), Language and Linguistics (344 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (224 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (183 citations). Frederick Williams has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Ronald E. Rice, Everett M. Rogers, Percy H. Tannenbaum, Peter R. Monge, Peter F. Ostwald, Rita C. Naremore, Keith Roe, Jack Whitehead, Robert Hopper and Paul Ammon. Their work appears in journals such as Language and Speech, The Classical World, American Educational Research Journal, Annals of the International Communication Association and Journal of Communication.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact