Keith Reeves

1.1k citations
6 papers · 775 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Keith Reeves

6 papers receiving 675 citations

Peers

Keith Reeves
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
  • Marketing 124
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 170
  • Gender Studies 117
  • Sociology and Political Science 526
  • Urban Studies 33
Replace Julian B. Roebuck with:
Julian B. Roebuck United States
Marti Hope Gonzales United States
Joseph Hraba United States
Jacqueline Macaulay United States
Fred Davis United States
Richard H. Nagasawa United States
Charles Herbert Stember Netherlands
Lois W. Banner United States
Isabella M. Zembrodt United States
Marylee C. Taylor United States
Keith Reeves relative to Julian B. Roebuck United States Julian B. Roebuck's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.1×
Julian B. Roebuck · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Keith Reeves

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Keith Reeves's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Keith Reeves with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Keith Reeves more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Keith Reeves

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Keith Reeves. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Keith Reeves. The network helps show where Keith Reeves may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside Keith Reeves, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Keith Reeves Line = papers co-authored together Keith Reeves links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

6 of 6 papers shown
#Work
1 1994339
2 1968230
3 1997123
4 196655
5 196922
6
Postoperative pain management in the non-Hispanic white and Mexican American older adult.
19996

About Keith Reeves

Keith Reeves is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Political Science and International Relations and Urban Studies, having authored 6 papers that have together received 775 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cultural Differences and Values (3 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (3 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (1 paper), Behavioral Health and Interventions (1 paper), Health Sciences Research and Education (1 paper), Housing Market and Economics (1 paper), Urbanization and City Planning (1 paper) and Electoral Systems and Political Participation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Marketing (124 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (170 citations), Gender Studies (117 citations), Sociology and Political Science (526 citations) and Urban Studies (33 citations). Keith Reeves has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Donn Byrne, Tara Jackson, Reynolds Farley, Maria Krysan, Charlotte Steeh, Don Nelson and William Griffitt. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Social Psychology, Journal of Personality, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, American Journal of Sociology and PubMed.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact