Keith D. Wing

2.4k citations
27 papers · 2.1k · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

Keith D. Wing

26 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers

Keith D. Wing
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Insect Science 1.2k
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 680
  • Plant Science 641
  • Molecular Biology 790
  • Pollution 117
Replace Julius J. Menn with:
Julius J. Menn United States
Eiichi Kuwano Japan
Andrew J. Forgash United States
Izuru YAMAMOTO Japan
Pensri Whiting United Kingdom
William E. Robbins United States
Jun-ichi FUKAMI Japan
Akinori Hirashima Japan
Don L. Bull United States
Hisashi Miyagawa Japan
Keith D. Wing relative to Julius J. Menn United States Julius J. Menn's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Julius J. Menn · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Keith D. Wing

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Keith D. Wing's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Keith D. Wing with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Keith D. Wing more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Keith D. Wing

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Keith D. Wing. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Keith D. Wing. The network helps show where Keith D. Wing may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Keith D. Wing, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Keith D. Wing Line = papers co-authored together Keith D. Wing links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1988358
2 1988339
3 2000253
4 2001177
5 1998166
6 198295
7 198184
8 198381
9 200566
10 199255
11 198254
12 198151
13 198745
14 197843
15 198443
16 198440
17 198429
18 200128
19 197925
20 197922

About Keith D. Wing

Keith D. Wing is a scholar working on Insect Science, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Plant Science, Molecular Biology and Pharmacology, having authored 27 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect and Pesticide Research (12 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (10 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (6 papers), Insect Resistance and Genetics (6 papers), Insect Pest Control Strategies (5 papers), Pesticide Exposure and Toxicity (5 papers), Synthesis and Biological Evaluation (4 papers) and Insect Pheromone Research and Control (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (1.2k citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (680 citations), Plant Science (641 citations), Molecular Biology (790 citations) and Pollution (117 citations). Keith D. Wing has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Czechia and France. Frequent co-authors include Richard A. Slawecki, Glenn R. Carlson, Bruce D. Hammock, Matthew D. Sacher, Michael E. Schnee, John E. Casida, Andrew H. Glickman, Thomas C. Sparks, Yuji Tsurubuchi and Davy Jones. Their work appears in journals such as Pest Management Science, Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology, Science, Journal of Comparative Physiology B and Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact