Amy Glasmeier

3.9k citations
90 papers · 2.6k · h-index 30

Impact in

Papers in

Amy Glasmeier

86 papers receiving 2.2k citations

Peers

Amy Glasmeier
Comparison fields: 5 of 121
  • Urban Studies 407
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 338
  • Strategy and Management 572
  • Economics and Econometrics 1.0k
  • Media Technology 220
Replace Susan Christopherson with:
Susan Christopherson United States
James Simmie United Kingdom
Michael Storper France
Peter Tyler United Kingdom
James T. Murphy United States
Roberto Camagni Italy
Richard Shearmur Canada
John R. Bryson United Kingdom
Ron Martin United Kingdom
Jane Jacobs
Amy Glasmeier relative to Susan Christopherson United States Susan Christopherson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Susan Christopherson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Amy Glasmeier

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amy Glasmeier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amy Glasmeier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amy Glasmeier more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amy Glasmeier

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amy Glasmeier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amy Glasmeier. The network helps show where Amy Glasmeier may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Amy Glasmeier, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Amy Glasmeier Line = papers co-authored together Amy Glasmeier links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 90 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1991231
2 1987182
3 2015176
4 2014156
5 2001144
6 1988117
7 2015104
8 200569
9 202163
10 200762
11 201660
12 201854
13 201649
14 202048
15 202345
16 198745
17
Manufacturing time : global competition in the watch industry, 1795-2000
200041
18 199340
19 199340
20 200237

About Amy Glasmeier

Amy Glasmeier is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Strategy and Management and General Health Professions, having authored 90 papers that have together received 2.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Regional Economics and Spatial Analysis (18 papers), Economic Growth and Productivity (9 papers), Regional Development and Policy (7 papers), Regional Economic and Spatial Analysis (6 papers), Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies (6 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (6 papers), Global trade and economics (5 papers) and Global trade, sustainability, and social impact (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Urban Studies (407 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (338 citations), Strategy and Management (572 citations), Economics and Econometrics (1.0k citations) and Media Technology (220 citations). Amy Glasmeier has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Susan Christopherson, Tracey Farrigan, Allen J. Scott, Ann Markusen, Mia Gray, Linda Lobao, Peter Hall, Ian H. Adams, Bruce R. Donald and Marie Howland. Their work appears in journals such as Cambridge Journal of Regions Economy and Society, Economic Geography, The Professional Geographer, Regional Studies and Economic Development Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact