Keith Bangerter

15 papers receiving 643 citations

Peers

Keith Bangerter
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 544
  • Urology 72
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 195
  • Clinical Psychology 95
  • Reproductive Medicine 16
Replace Jason W. Dean with:
Jason W. Dean United Kingdom
Ki Hak Moon South Korea
C.G. McMahon Australia
A. Solesse de Gendre France
Kew-Kim Chew Australia
Lucio Varanese United Kingdom
Giulia Castagna Italy
Antonio Martín Morales Spain
Jeffrey Campbell Canada
James H. Barada United States
Keith Bangerter relative to Jason W. Dean United Kingdom Jason W. Dean's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Jason W. Dean · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Keith Bangerter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Keith Bangerter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Keith Bangerter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Keith Bangerter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Keith Bangerter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Keith Bangerter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Keith Bangerter. The network helps show where Keith Bangerter may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Keith Bangerter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Keith Bangerter Line = papers co-authored together Keith Bangerter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 2003251
2 2005121
3 2005120
4 200661
5 200434
6 199924
7 201418
8 201514
9 20048
10 20157
11 20147
12 20055
13 20172
14 20152
15 20052

About Keith Bangerter

Keith Bangerter is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Clinical Psychology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Pharmaceutical Science, having authored 15 papers that have together received 676 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sexual function and dysfunction studies (8 papers), Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications (2 papers), Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research (1 paper), Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques (1 paper), Gynecological conditions and treatments (1 paper), Ovarian function and disorders (1 paper), Hormonal and reproductive studies (1 paper) and Reproductive Health and Contraception (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (544 citations), Urology (72 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (195 citations), Clinical Psychology (95 citations) and Reproductive Medicine (16 citations). Keith Bangerter has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Irwin Goldstein, Terry Taylor, Jay M. Young, Thomas P. Segerson, Raymond C. Rosen, Gary Karlin, Gerald Brock, Leonard R. Derogatis, Peter Pommerville and William A. Fisher. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, The Journal of Sexual Medicine, Contraception, Diabetes Care and American Journal of Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact