Kees van Boven

981 citations
50 papers · 540 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Kees van Boven

48 papers receiving 528 citations

Peers

Kees van Boven
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • Health Information Management 29
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 88
  • General Health Professions 85
  • Family Practice 6
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 8
Replace Rebecca Shackelton with:
Rebecca Shackelton United States
M Wood United States
Rebecca A. Aycock United States
J. William Kerns United States
Shahriar Khan Canada
Merethe Kirstine Kousgaard Andersen Denmark
Gerald Richardson United Kingdom
Gary R. Hollingworth Canada
Nesrın Nural Türkiye
M M Kochen Germany
Kees van Boven relative to Rebecca Shackelton United States Rebecca Shackelton's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.8×
Rebecca Shackelton · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kees van Boven

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kees van Boven's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kees van Boven with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kees van Boven more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kees van Boven

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kees van Boven. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kees van Boven. The network helps show where Kees van Boven may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Kees van Boven, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kees van Boven Line = papers co-authored together Kees van Boven links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 50 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201746
2 201142
3 201236
4 202131
5 201126
6 202024
7 202123
8 202119
9 201618
10 201217
11
Defensive testing in Dutch family practice. Is the grass greener on the other side of the ocean?
199717
12 201516
13 201816
14 201114
15 202113
16 201713
17 201912
18 201712
19 201611
20 202110

About Kees van Boven

Kees van Boven is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Epidemiology, Health Information Management, Psychiatry and Mental health and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 50 papers that have together received 540 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chronic Disease Management Strategies (8 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (7 papers), Medical Coding and Health Information (6 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (3 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (3 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (2 papers), Health, psychology, and well-being (2 papers) and Clinical practice guidelines implementation (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Information Management (29 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (88 citations), General Health Professions (85 citations), Family Practice (6 citations) and Geriatrics and Gerontology (8 citations). Kees van Boven has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Tim olde Hartman, Chris van Weel, Henk Schers, Annemarie Uijen, H Lamberts, S. Oskam, Peter Lucassen, Hans Bor, Hiske van Ravesteijn and Reinier Akkermans. Their work appears in journals such as Family Practice, British Journal of General Practice, The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, BMC Family Practice and Journal of Clinical Epidemiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact