K.E. Ebner

115 papers receiving 4.0k citations

Peers

K.E. Ebner
Comparison fields: 5 of 117
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 968
  • Virology 186
  • Genetics 996
  • Clinical Biochemistry 228
  • Molecular Biology 2.3k
Replace Peter Elsbach with:
Peter Elsbach United States
Roland Kellner Germany
John H. Brumell Canada
Karl‐Anders Karlsson Sweden
Geneviève Spik France
Michael F.G. Schmidt Germany
David Aminoff United States
Bożena Korczak Switzerland
Ossi Renkonen Finland
Xavier Robert France
K.E. Ebner relative to Peter Elsbach United States Peter Elsbach's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.6×
Peter Elsbach · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by K.E. Ebner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of K.E. Ebner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by K.E. Ebner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites K.E. Ebner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by K.E. Ebner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by K.E. Ebner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by K.E. Ebner. The network helps show where K.E. Ebner may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside K.E. Ebner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with K.E. Ebner Line = papers co-authored together K.E. Ebner links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 116 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1967340
2 1995282
3 1999240
4 1966204
5 1978179
6 1997178
7 1976167
8 1970162
9 1962154
10 1970142
11 1971139
12 1970134
13 197196
14 199192
15 196686
16 196176
17 196173
18 198664
19 197759
20 197157

About K.E. Ebner

K.E. Ebner is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Nutrition and Dietetics, Genetics, Surgery and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, having authored 116 papers that have together received 4.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Infant Nutrition and Health (26 papers), Digestive system and related health (17 papers), Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (16 papers), Protein Hydrolysis and Bioactive Peptides (14 papers), Enzyme Structure and Function (13 papers), Polyamine Metabolism and Applications (11 papers), Amino Acid Enzymes and Metabolism (11 papers) and Pancreatic function and diabetes (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nutrition and Dietetics (968 citations), Virology (186 citations), Genetics (996 citations), Clinical Biochemistry (228 citations) and Molecular Biology (2.3k citations). K.E. Ebner has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Urs Brodbeck, R. Padmanabhan, John F. Morrison, Stephen Clum, R. Mawal, Nobuyuki Tanahashi, F.L. Schanbacher, D.K. Fitzgerald, Collis R. Geren and Rajani Prasad. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Biological Chemistry, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, Analytical Biochemistry, Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics and Journal of Dairy Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact