Kathryn Coe

1.6k citations
70 papers · 1.2k · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Kathryn Coe

63 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Kathryn Coe
Comparison fields: 5 of 124
  • Applied Psychology 58
  • General Health Professions 284
  • Health 92
  • Gender Studies 106
  • Clinical Psychology 167
Replace Kirsten Bell with:
Kirsten Bell Canada
Nao Hagiwara United States
Ann McPherson United Kingdom
Catherine R Phillips Canada
Faisal Azaiza Israel
Alexandra Hawkey Australia
Dianne F. Harrison United States
Johann Lee Westmaas United States
Ronald P. Abeles United States
Lisa A. Molix United States
Kathryn Coe relative to Kirsten Bell Canada Kirsten Bell's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Kirsten Bell · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kathryn Coe

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kathryn Coe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kathryn Coe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kathryn Coe more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kathryn Coe

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kathryn Coe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kathryn Coe. The network helps show where Kathryn Coe may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Kathryn Coe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kathryn Coe Line = papers co-authored together Kathryn Coe links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 70 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013197
2 1997112
3
Mobilizing churches for health promotion in Latino communities: Compañeros en la Salud.
199587
4 201676
5 201169
6 200738
7 200736
8 201136
9 200435
10 201635
11 201530
12 200629
13 199429
14 201022
15 201822
16 201417
17 199316
18 201515
19 199515
20 200715

About Kathryn Coe

Kathryn Coe is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science, Health, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Cultural Studies, having authored 70 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (11 papers), Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (8 papers), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (7 papers), Community Health and Development (7 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (6 papers), Religion and Society Interactions (5 papers), Racial and Ethnic Identity Research (5 papers) and Romani and Gypsy Studies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (58 citations), General Health Professions (284 citations), Health (92 citations), Gender Studies (106 citations) and Clinical Psychology (167 citations). Kathryn Coe has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Serbia and Ecuador. Frequent co-authors include Felipe G. Castro, Craig T. Palmer, John C. Bailar, G. Marie Swanson, Mary Patricia Harmon, Lyle B. Steadman, Colleen S. Keller, Justin R. Garcia, Amanda N. Gesselman and Felipe González Castro. Their work appears in journals such as Zygon®, Cancer, Health Care For Women International, Human Nature and American Indian Culture and Research Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact