Kate Wright

926 citations
30 papers · 651 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

    • Media Studies and Communication 8
    • Social Media and Politics 6
    • Public Relations and Crisis Communication 4
    • Sex work and related issues 2
    • Disaster Management and Resilience 2

Kate Wright

28 papers receiving 603 citations

Peers

Kate Wright
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
  • Communication 213
  • Water Science and Technology 252
  • Biomedical Engineering 174
  • Sociology and Political Science 166
  • Surfaces, Coatings and Films 23
Replace Kwang‐Ho Ahn with:
Kwang‐Ho Ahn South Korea
Dine Brinkman Netherlands
Nida Zafar Pakistan
Ruoyun Lin China
Robert Dürr Germany
R.G. Klaassen Netherlands
Robert L. Savage United States
Mingsheng Li China
Bingjie Yu China
Kate Wright relative to Kwang‐Ho Ahn South Korea Kwang‐Ho Ahn's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×9.3×
Kwang‐Ho Ahn · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kate Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kate Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kate Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kate Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kate Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kate Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kate Wright. The network helps show where Kate Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Kate Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kate Wright Line = papers co-authored together Kate Wright links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1996149
2 1994137
3 201960
4 201752
5 201828
6 202026
7 201726
8 201925
9 201024
10 201420
11 201820
12 202115
13 201512
14 20189
15 20118
16 20187
17 20236
18
The State of Humanitarian Journalism
20186
19 20134
20 20244

About Kate Wright

Kate Wright is a scholar working on Communication, Sociology and Political Science, Health, Geography, Planning and Development and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 30 papers that have together received 651 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Media Studies and Communication (8 papers), Social Media and Politics (6 papers), Public Relations and Crisis Communication (4 papers), Geographies of human-animal interactions (4 papers), Intimate Partner and Family Violence (3 papers), Sex work and related issues (2 papers), Membrane Separation Technologies (2 papers) and Disaster Management and Resilience (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (213 citations), Water Science and Technology (252 citations), Biomedical Engineering (174 citations), Sociology and Political Science (166 citations) and Surfaces, Coatings and Films (23 citations). Kate Wright has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Zhanfeng Cui, Mel Bunce, Martin Scott, Rodrigo Zamith, Saba Bebawi, Lee C. Edmonds, Leesa Hooker and Jennifer Power. Their work appears in journals such as Journalism Studies, Journalism, Journal of Membrane Science, The International Journal of Press/Politics and Digital Journalism.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact