Kate Smith

2.1k citations
72 papers · 1.6k · 1 hit paper · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Kate Smith

67 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Kate Smith's Hit Papers

Global Prevalence of Young-Onset Dementia 2021 · 266 citations
2660+1+3Years since publication50100150200250

Peers

Kate Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
  • Health 321
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 371
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 83
  • General Health Professions 245
  • Periodontics 43
Replace Heather Gilmour with:
Heather Gilmour Canada
Monica Cations Australia
Dylan J. Jester United States
Wataru Koyano Japan
Gwen Yeo United States
Marie Ernsth Bravell Sweden
Amanda Reichard United States
Christine M. Ulbricht United States
Barbara E. Harrison United States
Philip D. St. John Canada
Kate Smith relative to Heather Gilmour Canada Heather Gilmour's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×11.8×
Heather Gilmour · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kate Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kate Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kate Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kate Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kate Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kate Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kate Smith. The network helps show where Kate Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Kate Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kate Smith Line = papers co-authored together Kate Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 72 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Global Prevalence of Young-Onset Dementia
Hit paper breakdown →
2021266
2 2008154
3 2006114
4 1984104
5 201065
6 201563
7 201155
8 201455
9 201655
10 201954
11 202047
12 201036
13 201035
14 201230
15 201029
16 200928
17 202027
18 201325
19 200723
20 202118

About Kate Smith

Kate Smith is a scholar working on Health, Psychiatry and Mental health, General Health Professions, Geriatrics and Gerontology and Emergency Medical Services, having authored 72 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights (21 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (9 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (6 papers), Indigenous Studies and Ecology (5 papers), Global Health Workforce Issues (4 papers), Frailty in Older Adults (3 papers), Dental Health and Care Utilization (2 papers) and Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (321 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (371 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (83 citations), General Health Professions (245 citations) and Periodontics (43 citations). Kate Smith has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Leon A Flicker, Dina LoGiudice, David N. Atkinson, Nicola T. Lautenschlager, Osvaldo P. Almeida, Anna Dwyer, Zoë Hyde, Melissa A. Lindeman, Stephen G Fenner and Edward Strivens. Their work appears in journals such as Australasian Journal on Ageing, Alzheimer s & Dementia, Rural and Remote Health, International Psychogeriatrics and Australian Journal of Rural Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact