Kate Revill
Impact in
- Hepatology top 10%
- Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
- Cancer Research top 10%
- Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
Papers in
-
- Motor Control and Adaptation 4
-
- Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies 8
- Co-authors
- Yujin Hoshida (3 shared papers)Josep M. Llovet (4 shared papers)Anja Lachenmayer (2 shared papers)Kensuke Kojima (2 shared papers)Scott Powers (2 shared papers)Andrew Harrington (2 shared papers)Kevin J. Dudley (4 shared papers)Cathrin M. Buetefisch (9 shared papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Neurophysiology (3 papers)Neurorehabilitation and neural repair (3 papers)Journal of Hepatology (2 papers)Neuroscience (1 paper)Neurology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomSpain
In The Last Decade
Kate Revill
24 papers receiving 946 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
- Hepatology 80
- Cancer Research 145
- Neurology 76
- Molecular Biology 453
- Cognitive Neuroscience 110
Countries citing papers authored by Kate Revill
This map shows the geographic impact of Kate Revill's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kate Revill with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kate Revill more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kate Revill
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kate Revill. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kate Revill. The network helps show where Kate Revill may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Kate Revill, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2014 | 250 | |
| 2 | 2013 | 170 | |
| 3 | 2012 | 110 | |
| 4 | 2014 | 68 | |
| 5 | 2015 | 65 | |
| 6 | 2013 | 48 | |
| 7 | 2015 | 47 | |
| 8 | 2008 | 41 | |
| 9 | 2009 | 30 | |
| 10 | 2018 | 30 | |
| 11 | 2009 | 28 | |
| 12 | 2020 | 17 | |
| 13 | 2020 | 14 | |
| 14 | 2019 | 7 | |
| 15 | 2024 | 7 | |
| 16 | 2007 | 6 | |
| 17 | 2017 | 6 | |
| 18 | 2023 | 5 | |
| 19 | 2022 | 4 | |
| 20 | 2011 | 3 |
About Kate Revill
Kate Revill is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Neurology, Molecular Biology, Genetics and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 25 papers that have together received 962 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (8 papers), Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (4 papers), Genetic Syndromes and Imprinting (4 papers), Motor Control and Adaptation (4 papers), Multisensory perception and integration (3 papers), Muscle activation and electromyography studies (3 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (3 papers) and Cancer-related gene regulation (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Hepatology (80 citations), Cancer Research (145 citations), Neurology (76 citations), Molecular Biology (453 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (110 citations). Kate Revill has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Yujin Hoshida, Josep M. Llovet, Anja Lachenmayer, Kensuke Kojima, Scott Powers, Andrew Harrington, Kevin J. Dudley, Cathrin M. Buetefisch, Richard N. Clayton and William E. Farrell. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neurophysiology, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair, Journal of Hepatology, Neuroscience and Neurology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.