Kate Power
Impact in
- Gender Studies top 5%
- Gender Diversity and Inequality
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- COVID-19 and Mental Health
Papers in
-
- Social and Cultural Dynamics 2
-
- Environmental Sustainability in Business 5
- Co-authors
- Oksana Mont (8 shared papers)Peter Crosthwaite (2 shared papers)Eva Heiskanen (1 shared paper)A. van Enk (1 shared paper)Ashok Kotwal (1 shared paper)Sheena Gardner (1 shared paper)
In The Last Decade
Kate Power
16 papers receiving 817 citations
Kate Power's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
- Gender Studies 107
- Clinical Psychology 213
- Health 54
- General Health Professions 164
- Sociology and Political Science 292
Countries citing papers authored by Kate Power
This map shows the geographic impact of Kate Power's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kate Power with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kate Power more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kate Power
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kate Power. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kate Power. The network helps show where Kate Power may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 6 scholars most cited alongside Kate Power, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The COVID-19 pandemic has increased the care burden of women and families Hit paper breakdown → | 2020 | 706 |
| 2 | 2013 | 27 | |
| 3 | 2010 | 23 | |
| 4 | 2010 | 21 | |
| 5 | 2022 | 16 | |
| 6 | 2017 | 15 | |
| 7 | Understanding factors that shape consumption | 2013 | 9 |
| 8 | 2021 | 7 | |
| 9 | Women in business media: a critical discourse analysis of representations of women in Forbes, Fortune and Bloomberg Businessweek, 2015-2017 | 2019 | 7 |
| 10 | Dispelling the myths about consumption behaviour | 2010 | 5 |
| 11 | 2023 | 5 | |
| 12 | 2015 | 3 | |
| 13 | Analysis of latest outcomes of academic work on sustainable consumption 2010-2012 | 2012 | 2 |
| 14 | Understanding the complexity of consumer behaviour and implications for the sustainable consumption discourse | 2010 | 1 |
| 15 | 2016 | 1 | |
| 16 | The role of values and public perceptions in policy making for sustainable consumption | 2011 | 1 |
| 17 | 2017 | 1 | |
| 18 | 2013 | 0 |
About Kate Power
Kate Power is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Marketing, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Language and Linguistics and Literature and Literary Theory, having authored 18 papers that have together received 850 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Environmental Education and Sustainability (5 papers), Environmental Sustainability in Business (5 papers), Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (3 papers), Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (3 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (2 papers), Social and Cultural Dynamics (2 papers), Translation Studies and Practices (1 paper) and Media, Gender, and Advertising (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (107 citations), Clinical Psychology (213 citations), Health (54 citations), General Health Professions (164 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (292 citations). Kate Power has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Sweden and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Oksana Mont, Peter Crosthwaite, Eva Heiskanen, A. van Enk, Ashok Kotwal and Sheena Gardner. Their work appears in journals such as Sustainability, Discourse & Society, Poetics, Journal of Consumer Policy and Sustainability Science Practice and Policy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.