Kate E. Murray

905 citations
44 papers · 628 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Kate E. Murray

36 papers receiving 610 citations

Peers

Kate E. Murray
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Clinical Psychology 186
  • Safety Research 61
  • General Health Professions 105
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 78
  • Health Informatics 6
Replace Eulàlia Hernández Encuentra with:
Eulàlia Hernández Encuentra Spain
Valentina Iemmi United Kingdom
Carolina Ziebold Brazil
Bruce D. Watt Australia
Ryann N. Crowley United States
Gautam Saha India
Poushali Ganguli United Kingdom
Ceri Wilson United Kingdom
Kris Van den Broeck Belgium
Joshua Holmes United Kingdom
Kate E. Murray relative to Eulàlia Hernández Encuentra Spain Eulàlia Hernández Encuentra's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6.1×
Eulàlia Hernández Encuentra · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kate E. Murray

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kate E. Murray's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kate E. Murray with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kate E. Murray more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kate E. Murray

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kate E. Murray. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kate E. Murray. The network helps show where Kate E. Murray may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Kate E. Murray, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kate E. Murray Line = papers co-authored together Kate E. Murray links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 44 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201757
2 201855
3 201752
4 201647
5 201745
6 201339
7 201839
8 202232
9 201929
10 201828
11 202025
12 202124
13 202022
14 201821
15 201615
16 202014
17 201713
18 201911
19 201910
20 20226

About Kate E. Murray

Kate E. Murray is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions, Safety Research, Social Psychology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 44 papers that have together received 628 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Migration, Health and Trauma (13 papers), Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (3 papers), Cultural Competency in Health Care (3 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (3 papers), Child Welfare and Adoption (3 papers), Physical Activity and Health (3 papers), Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (3 papers) and Health Literacy and Information Accessibility (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (186 citations), Safety Research (61 citations), General Health Professions (105 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (78 citations) and Health Informatics (6 citations). Kate E. Murray has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Ignacio Correa‐Velez, Robert Schweitzer, Caroline Lenette, Lyn Vromans, Mark Brough, Jane Shakespeare‐Finch, Camille Nebeker, Suneeta V. Godbole, Jacqueline Kerr and Elva Maria Arredondo. Their work appears in journals such as Health & Social Care in the Community, Traumatology An International Journal, PLoS ONE, Australian Psychologist and Psychotherapy Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact