Peter James
Impact in
- Insect Science top 1%
- Insect and Pesticide Research
- Insect Utilization and Effects
- Behavioral Neuroscience top 5%
Papers in
-
- Insect and Pesticide Research 26
- Forensic Entomology and Diptera Studies 14
- Insect Utilization and Effects 12
-
- Helminth infection and control 11
- Co-authors
- John Nyby (2 shared papers)Benjamin V. Bloch (35 shared papers)Hosam E. Matar (22 shared papers)Roger D. Moon (4 shared papers)M Welfare (3 shared papers)Elaine McColl (2 shared papers)John Roger Barton (2 shared papers)Seong Won Han (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Veterinary Parasitology (14 papers)Animal Production Science (11 papers)The Knee (6 papers)Australasian Journal of Paramedicine (6 papers)The Journal of Arthroplasty (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Peter James
155 papers receiving 2.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 178
- Insect Science 556
- Behavioral Neuroscience 130
- Small Animals 219
- Parasitology 155
- Surgery 467
Countries citing papers authored by Peter James
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter James's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter James with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter James more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter James
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter James. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter James. The network helps show where Peter James may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter James, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 180 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2002 | 269 | |
| 2 | The future of coal | 1982 | 157 |
| 3 | 2005 | 122 | |
| 4 | 2022 | 103 | |
| 5 | 2010 | 91 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 76 | |
| 7 | 2015 | 73 | |
| 8 | 2006 | 72 | |
| 9 | 2011 | 65 | |
| 10 | 2020 | 58 | |
| 11 | 2014 | 50 | |
| 12 | 2019 | 48 | |
| 13 | 2021 | 39 | |
| 14 | 2019 | 38 | |
| 15 | 2009 | 38 | |
| 16 | 2021 | 35 | |
| 17 | 1998 | 34 | |
| 18 | 2010 | 31 | |
| 19 | 2006 | 29 | |
| 20 | 2014 | 29 |
About Peter James
Peter James is a scholar working on Insect Science, Small Animals, Surgery, Parasitology and Animal Science and Zoology, having authored 180 papers that have together received 2.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes (38 papers), Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty (27 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (26 papers), Insect Pest Control Strategies (16 papers), Orthopedic Infections and Treatments (16 papers), Forensic Entomology and Diptera Studies (14 papers), Insect Utilization and Effects (12 papers) and Helminth infection and control (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (556 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (130 citations), Small Animals (219 citations), Parasitology (155 citations) and Surgery (467 citations). Peter James has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include John Nyby, Benjamin V. Bloch, Hosam E. Matar, Roger D. Moon, M Welfare, Elaine McColl, John Roger Barton, Seong Won Han, Ian Nicholas Steen and Susan Elizabeth Snape. Their work appears in journals such as Veterinary Parasitology, Animal Production Science, The Knee, Australasian Journal of Paramedicine and The Journal of Arthroplasty.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.