Kate Bailey
Impact in
- Plant Science top 10%
- Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity
- Plant Pathogens and Resistance
- Plant Disease Resistance and Genetics
- Plant Pathogenic Bacteria Studies
- Legume Nitrogen Fixing Symbiosis
- Cell Biology top 10%
- Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases
Papers in
-
- Plant Pathogens and Resistance 4
- Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity 3
- Plant Disease Resistance and Genetics 2
-
- CRISPR and Genetic Engineering 1
- Bacillus and Francisella bacterial research 1
- Co-authors
- Nathan R. Rustay (1 shared paper)Jacqueline N. Crawley (1 shared paper)Jonathan D. G. Jones (4 shared papers)Eric B. Holub (4 shared papers)Alexandre Robert‐Seilaniantz (2 shared papers)Torsten Schultz‐Larsen (2 shared papers)Eric Kemen (2 shared papers)Anastasia Gardiner (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- PLoS Biology (1 paper)Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions (1 paper)New Phytologist (1 paper)Plant Cell Reports (1 paper)ILAR Journal (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesIndia
In The Last Decade
Kate Bailey
7 papers receiving 437 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
- Plant Science 314
- Cell Biology 130
- Behavioral Neuroscience 14
- Biological Psychiatry 6
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 41
Countries citing papers authored by Kate Bailey
This map shows the geographic impact of Kate Bailey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kate Bailey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kate Bailey more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kate Bailey
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kate Bailey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kate Bailey. The network helps show where Kate Bailey may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Kate Bailey, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2011 | 189 | |
| 2 | 2006 | 98 | |
| 3 | 2011 | 65 | |
| 4 | 2015 | 61 | |
| 5 | 2022 | 16 | |
| 6 | 2003 | 12 | |
| 7 | Overlapping protection in the ribonuclease protection assay due to complementary vector sequences. | 1994 | 1 |
About Kate Bailey
Kate Bailey is a scholar working on Plant Science, Molecular Biology, Cell Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Social Psychology, having authored 7 papers that have together received 442 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant Pathogens and Resistance (4 papers), Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity (3 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (2 papers), Plant Disease Resistance and Genetics (2 papers), Adipose Tissue and Metabolism (1 paper), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (1 paper), Bacillus and Francisella bacterial research (1 paper) and Plant Taxonomy and Phylogenetics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Plant Science (314 citations), Cell Biology (130 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (14 citations), Biological Psychiatry (6 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (41 citations). Kate Bailey has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and India. Frequent co-authors include Nathan R. Rustay, Jacqueline N. Crawley, Jonathan D. G. Jones, Eric B. Holub, Alexandre Robert‐Seilaniantz, Torsten Schultz‐Larsen, Eric Kemen, Anastasia Gardiner, Alexi L. Balmuth and Ariane Kemen. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS Biology, Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions, New Phytologist, Plant Cell Reports and ILAR Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.