Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions

276.5k citations
4.4k papers · · active since 2016

Impact in

  • Plant Science top 0.2%
    • Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity
    • Legume Nitrogen Fixing Symbiosis
    • Plant Pathogenic Bacteria Studies
    • Plant Virus Research Studies
    • Plant Parasitism and Resistance
    • Nematode management and characterization studies
    • Plant Disease Resistance and Genetics
  • Horticulture top 0.5%

Papers in

    • Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity 2.2k
    • Legume Nitrogen Fixing Symbiosis 1.5k
    • Plant Pathogenic Bacteria Studies 1.1k
    • Plant Virus Research Studies 739
    • Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism 491
    • Plant Disease Resistance and Genetics 483
    • Nematode management and characterization studies 313

Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions

4.4k papers receiving 264.9k citations

Peers

Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions
Comparison fields: 5 of 192
  • Plant Science 242.9k
  • Horticulture 3.1k
  • Cell Biology 38.0k
  • Endocrinology 11.4k
  • Insect Science 17.3k
Replace Scientia Horticulturae with:
Scientia Horticulturae China
European Journal of Plant Pathology United States
Trends in Plant Science United States
Plant Pathology United Kingdom
HortScience United States
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMATIC AND EVOLUTIONARY MICROBIOLOGY China
Plant Molecular Biology United States
Annals of Applied Biology United Kingdom
BMC Plant Biology China
Euphytica United States
Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions relative to Scientia Horticulturae China Scientia Horticulturae's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.8×
Scientia Horticulturae · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions.

About Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions

The 4.4k papers published in Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions in the last decades have received a total of 276.5k indexed citations . Papers published in Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions usually cover Plant Science (4.2k papers), Horticulture (56 papers), Endocrinology (214 papers), Cell Biology (603 papers) and Biotechnology (260 papers) specifically the topics of Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity (2.2k papers), Legume Nitrogen Fixing Symbiosis (1.5k papers), Plant Pathogenic Bacteria Studies (1.1k papers), Plant Virus Research Studies (739 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (595 papers), Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism (491 papers), Plant Disease Resistance and Genetics (483 papers) and Nematode management and characterization studies (313 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions are Corné M. J. Pieterse, Ben J. J. Lugtenberg, Robert H. Proctor, Sophien Kamoun, Melvin D. Bolton, Daniel F. Klessig, Christoph Keel, Guido V. Bloemberg, Martinez-Romero Esperanza and Mónica Rosenblueth.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact