Kara J. Blacker

817 citations
29 papers · 540 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Kara J. Blacker

26 papers receiving 524 citations

Peers

Kara J. Blacker
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 194
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 287
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 97
  • Neurology 48
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 25
Replace Stefano Sdoia with:
Stefano Sdoia Italy
Paola Verde Italy
Antje Heinrich United Kingdom
Virve Vuontela Finland
Bobby Stojanoski Canada
Yoko Ishigami Canada
Γεωργία Ανδρέου Greece
Drew Morris United States
Timothy K. Miura United States
M. Rizzo United States
Kara J. Blacker relative to Stefano Sdoia Italy Stefano Sdoia's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Stefano Sdoia · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kara J. Blacker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kara J. Blacker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kara J. Blacker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kara J. Blacker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kara J. Blacker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kara J. Blacker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kara J. Blacker. The network helps show where Kara J. Blacker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Kara J. Blacker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kara J. Blacker Line = papers co-authored together Kara J. Blacker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201489
2 201378
3 201848
4 201742
5 201742
6 201241
7 201729
8 202023
9 201417
10 202116
11 202215
12 201614
13 201614
14 202013
15 202111
16 201110
17 20218
18 20208
19 20187
20 20235

About Kara J. Blacker

Kara J. Blacker is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Genetics, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, having authored 29 papers that have together received 540 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (14 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (8 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (5 papers), High Altitude and Hypoxia (5 papers), Cognitive Abilities and Testing (5 papers), Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (4 papers), Face Recognition and Perception (3 papers) and Cognitive Science and Mapping (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (194 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (287 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (97 citations), Neurology (48 citations) and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (25 citations). Kara J. Blacker has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and France. Frequent co-authors include Kim M. Curby, Susan Courtney, Jason Chein, Daniel G. McHail, Joshua B. Ewen, Kyle A. Pettijohn, Adam T. Biggs, Marian E. Berryhill, Dwight J. Peterson and Kevin T. Jones. Their work appears in journals such as Visual Cognition, Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, Attention Perception & Psychophysics, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience and Frontiers in Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact