Kara J. Blacker

1.1k citations
34 papers · 844 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Kara J. Blacker

31 papers receiving 816 citations

Peers

Kara J. Blacker
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 201
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 282
  • Otorhinolaryngology 53
  • Sensory Systems 39
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 103
Replace Carol A. Boliek with:
Carol A. Boliek Canada
Jessica E. Huber United States
Gail B. Kempster United States
Paul Corthals Belgium
Carl C. Crandell United States
Robert L. Ringel United States
Theo S. Kapteyn Netherlands
Wendy J. Huinck Netherlands
Daniel R. Boone United States
Tanya L. Eadie United States
Kara J. Blacker relative to Carol A. Boliek Canada Carol A. Boliek's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×4.7×
Carol A. Boliek · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kara J. Blacker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kara J. Blacker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kara J. Blacker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kara J. Blacker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kara J. Blacker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kara J. Blacker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kara J. Blacker. The network helps show where Kara J. Blacker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Kara J. Blacker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kara J. Blacker Line = papers co-authored together Kara J. Blacker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011121
2 2013106
3 2014103
4 201386
5 201856
6 201748
7 201745
8 201242
9 201730
10 202024
11 202118
12 202016
13 202216
14 201416
15 201615
16 201614
17 202113
18 202112
19 202111
20 201111

About Kara J. Blacker

Kara J. Blacker is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Neurology, Genetics and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 34 papers that have together received 844 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (14 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (9 papers), High Altitude and Hypoxia (6 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (5 papers), Cognitive Abilities and Testing (4 papers), Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (4 papers), Cognitive Science and Mapping (3 papers) and Face Recognition and Perception (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (201 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (282 citations), Otorhinolaryngology (53 citations), Sensory Systems (39 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (103 citations). Kara J. Blacker has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and France. Frequent co-authors include Kim M. Curby, Kai Zhao, Jianbo Jiang, Susan M Courtney, Jason M. Chein, Bruce P. Bryant, Yuehao Luo, Daniel G. McHail, Joshua B. Ewen and Kyle A. Pettijohn. Their work appears in journals such as Visual Cognition, Attention Perception & Psychophysics, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience and Journal of Neurophysiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact