Junxia Zeng

11 papers receiving 507 citations

Peers

Junxia Zeng
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 86
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 16
  • Gender Studies 37
  • Nephrology 29
  • Epidemiology 91
Replace José Luis Pontijas Calderón with:
José Luis Pontijas Calderón United States
Firman Witoelar United States
Laurie Brown Australia
Hsu‐Min Tseng Taiwan
Sandy Liles United States
Sulabha Parasuraman India
Gireesh V. Gupchup United States
Kristi W. Kelley United States
Daniel Jason Potter United States
Seunghyun Yoo South Korea
Junxia Zeng relative to José Luis Pontijas Calderón United States José Luis Pontijas Calderón's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×7.6×
José Luis Pontijas Calderón · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Junxia Zeng

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Junxia Zeng's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Junxia Zeng with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Junxia Zeng more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Junxia Zeng

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Junxia Zeng. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Junxia Zeng. The network helps show where Junxia Zeng may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Junxia Zeng, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Junxia Zeng Line = papers co-authored together Junxia Zeng links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 2019246
2 2013104
3 201552
4 201234
5 201326
6 202017
7 202217
8 202113
9 20139
10 20196
11 20142
12 20261

About Junxia Zeng

Junxia Zeng is a scholar working on Gender Studies, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Political Science and International Relations, Education and Epidemiology, having authored 12 papers that have together received 527 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include School Choice and Performance (2 papers), Income, Poverty, and Inequality (2 papers), Agricultural Innovations and Practices (2 papers), Gender Politics and Representation (2 papers), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (2 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (2 papers), Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control (1 paper) and Gender, Education, and Development Issues (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (86 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (16 citations), Gender Studies (37 citations), Nephrology (29 citations) and Epidemiology (91 citations). Junxia Zeng has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Xiaopeng Pang, Scott Rozelle, Linxiu Zhang, Yafeng Wang, Xinxin Chen, Qinqin Meng, Peifeng Hu, Yuan S Zhang, Eileen M. Crimmins and John A Strauss. Their work appears in journals such as China Economic Review, American Journal of Epidemiology, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, PLoS ONE and Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact