June Smith

445 citations
16 papers · 270 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

June Smith

15 papers receiving 231 citations

Peers

June Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics 34
  • Literature and Literary Theory 114
  • Research and Theory 8
  • Education 103
  • Linguistics and Language 14
Replace Wine Tesseur with:
Wine Tesseur United Kingdom
Eni Puccinelli Orlandi Brazil
Bob Boughton Australia
Hillary A. Dachi Tanzania
Annabelle Estera United States
Eve Coxon New Zealand
Flávia Rezende Brazil
William Vance Trollinger United States
Anh Hai Le Australia
Christopher McAll Canada
June Smith relative to Wine Tesseur United Kingdom Wine Tesseur's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×17×
Wine Tesseur · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by June Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of June Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by June Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites June Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by June Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by June Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by June Smith. The network helps show where June Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside June Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with June Smith Line = papers co-authored together June Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1
Improving Learning in College: Rethinking Literacies Across the Curriculum
200966
2 200954
3 201339
4 200731
5 196720
6 200515
7 200313
8 20158
9 20058
10 20086
11 20144
12 20093
13 20041
14 20041
15
MacMurray's Midwives.
19691
16
Facilitators and barriers to health care access amongst people using image and performance enhancing drugs in Wales: Findings & Outcomes Report.
20200

About June Smith

June Smith is a scholar working on Human Factors and Ergonomics, Education, Political Science and International Relations, Oncology and Literature and Literary Theory, having authored 16 papers that have together received 270 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovative Education and Learning Practices (4 papers), Education Systems and Policy (4 papers), Global Educational Policies and Reforms (3 papers), Literacy, Media, and Education (2 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (2 papers), Patient Safety and Medication Errors (1 paper), Nursing Education, Practice, and Leadership (1 paper) and Health and Well-being Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Human Factors and Ergonomics (34 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (114 citations), Research and Theory (8 citations), Education (103 citations) and Linguistics and Language (14 citations). June Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Trinidad and Tobago. Frequent co-authors include Richard Edwards, Candice Satchwell, Roz Ivanič, Zoë Fowler, Kate Miller, Marilyn Martin‐Jones, Dávid Barton, Greg Mannion, Richard Edwards and Kimlin T. Ashing‐Giwa. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Vocational Education and Training, Journal of Cancer Survivorship, British Educational Research Journal, Psycho-Oncology and Studies in the Education of Adults.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact