Julie Benoit

806 citations
28 papers · 666 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Julie Benoit

27 papers receiving 649 citations

Peers

Julie Benoit
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Neurology 128
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 150
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 87
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 110
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 120
Replace Hiroto Ohata with:
Hiroto Ohata Japan
Kinya Nishimura Japan
O. Bosse Germany
Hugo Angleys Denmark
F.W. Bertelsmann Netherlands
Judith Sonn Israel
M Matsunaga Japan
Bhaswati Roy United States
Bibek Gyanwali Singapore
Roar Juul Norway
Julie Benoit relative to Hiroto Ohata Japan Hiroto Ohata's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.7×
Hiroto Ohata · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Julie Benoit

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julie Benoit's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julie Benoit with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julie Benoit more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julie Benoit

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julie Benoit. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julie Benoit. The network helps show where Julie Benoit may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Julie Benoit, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Julie Benoit Line = papers co-authored together Julie Benoit links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1999110
2 199793
3 200181
4 200146
5 199541
6 199936
7 199835
8 200534
9 201533
10 199328
11 199921
12 199017
13 199513
14 198911
15 199011
16 199610
17 19909
18 19948
19 19926
20 20045

About Julie Benoit

Julie Benoit is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, Surgery, Cognitive Neuroscience and Neurology, having authored 28 papers that have together received 666 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Retinal Development and Disorders (9 papers), Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (9 papers), Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders (7 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (4 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (3 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (3 papers), Retinopathy of Prematurity Studies (3 papers) and Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (128 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (150 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (87 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (110 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (120 citations). Julie Benoit has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, France and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Ronald Schondorf, Theodore Wein, Pierre Lachapelle, Reuben D. Stein, Denis Phaneuf, Richard J. Roberts, William A. Cupples, J. M. Little, Sylvain Chemtob and Magda Barsoum‐Homsy. Their work appears in journals such as Documenta Ophthalmologica, Vision Research, Journal of Applied Physiology, Canadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology and Pediatric Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact