Julia Wolf

12 papers receiving 326 citations

Peers

Julia Wolf
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 67
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 102
  • Urology 35
  • Neurology 58
  • Genetics 26
Replace Daniela Moncini with:
Daniela Moncini Italy
Joram Sawady United States
Shiyu Tong China
Diana M. Iglesias Canada
Marilda H. Chung United States
Mary H. Waziri United States
E. Piazzola Italy
Evelina Silvestri Italy
Jeffrey S. Dome United States
Martina Rinelli Italy
Julia Wolf relative to Daniela Moncini Italy Daniela Moncini's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.6×
Daniela Moncini · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Julia Wolf

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julia Wolf's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julia Wolf with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julia Wolf more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julia Wolf

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julia Wolf. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julia Wolf. The network helps show where Julia Wolf may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Julia Wolf, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Julia Wolf Line = papers co-authored together Julia Wolf links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 1997119
2 201455
3 201936
4 201933
5 202120
6
Treatment of advanced Hodgkin's lymphoma: standard and experimental approaches.
199920
7
Prädiktive PD-L1-Immunhistochemie beim nichtkleinzelligen Bronchialkarzinom. Aktueller Stand und Erfahrungen der ersten deutschen Harmonisierungsstudie
201617
8 201412
9 20028
10 20027
11 19905
12 20181

About Julia Wolf

Julia Wolf is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Neurology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Molecular Biology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 12 papers that have together received 333 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (6 papers), CNS Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (4 papers), Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations (3 papers), Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research (2 papers), Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research (1 paper), Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments (1 paper), Immunotherapy and Immune Responses (1 paper) and Mitochondrial Function and Pathology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (67 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (102 citations), Urology (35 citations), Neurology (58 citations) and Genetics (26 citations). Julia Wolf has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Osama M. Elashry, Ralph V. Clayman, Volker Diehl, Andreas Engert, Rebecca Oliver, Andrew McMillan, Catherine Hildyard, John Griffith, Chris S.R Hatton and Graham P. Collins. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of Oncology, British Journal of Haematology, Blood, The Journal of Urology and Blood Advances.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact