Julia Tanney

884 citations
20 papers · 419 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

    • Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics 5
    • Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications 4
    • Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education 2
    • Philosophical Ethics and Theory 2
    • Philosophy and Theoretical Science 4

Julia Tanney

17 papers receiving 341 citations

Peers

Julia Tanney
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • History and Philosophy of Science 111
  • Philosophy 171
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 185
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 174
  • Cultural Studies 28
Replace Hans‐Johann Glock with:
Hans‐Johann Glock Switzerland
Gregory McCulloch United Kingdom
Josefa Toribio Spain
Ausonio Marras Canada
Charles Wallis United States
Jane Heal United Kingdom
Rita Nolan United States
Jean-Michel Roy France
Frederick Adams United States
Ullin T. Place United Kingdom
Julia Tanney relative to Hans‐Johann Glock Switzerland Hans‐Johann Glock's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Hans‐Johann Glock · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Julia Tanney

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julia Tanney's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julia Tanney with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julia Tanney more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julia Tanney

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julia Tanney. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julia Tanney. The network helps show where Julia Tanney may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 2 scholars most cited alongside Julia Tanney, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Julia Tanney Line = papers co-authored together Julia Tanney links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 1995318
2
Normativity and Judgement
199932
3 199516
4 201213
5 19998
6 20055
7 20044
8 19964
9 20003
10 20083
11 20022
12 20172
13 19952
14 19942
15 20081
16
Interpretation, irrationality, and psychological norms.
19911
17 19981
18 20181
19 20221
20 20170

About Julia Tanney

Julia Tanney is a scholar working on Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, History and Philosophy of Science, Clinical Psychology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 20 papers that have together received 419 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (5 papers), Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications (4 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (4 papers), Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education (2 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (2 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (2 papers), Psychedelics and Drug Studies (1 paper) and Themes in Literature Analysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (111 citations), Philosophy (171 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (185 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (174 citations) and Cultural Studies (28 citations). Julia Tanney has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Ruth Garrett Millikan and David Papineau. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophy, Ratio, The Philosophical Quarterly, Synthese and Philosophical Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact