Frederick Adams

1.1k citations
31 papers · 597 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Frederick Adams

29 papers receiving 514 citations

Peers

Frederick Adams
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 369
  • History and Philosophy of Science 83
  • Philosophy 203
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 201
  • General Psychology 12
Replace N. J. H. Dent with:
N. J. H. Dent United Kingdom
Jane Heal United Kingdom
William Ramsey United States
Gregory McCulloch United Kingdom
Kathleen V. Wilkes United States
Rita Nolan United States
Ian Ravenscroft Australia
Ullin T. Place United Kingdom
Jean-Michel Roy France
Julia Tanney United Kingdom
Frederick Adams relative to N. J. H. Dent United Kingdom N. J. H. Dent's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.2×
N. J. H. Dent · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Frederick Adams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frederick Adams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frederick Adams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frederick Adams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frederick Adams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frederick Adams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frederick Adams. The network helps show where Frederick Adams may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside Frederick Adams, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Frederick Adams Line = papers co-authored together Frederick Adams links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198692
2 199289
3 197853
4 199244
5 200340
6 198939
7 200134
8 197933
9 201031
10 201031
11 201031
12
Folk concepts, surveys and intentional action
200718
13 19868
14 19867
15 19956
16
The semantics of thought
19926
17 19974
18 20074
19 19934
20 19894

About Frederick Adams

Frederick Adams is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Philosophy, Artificial Intelligence and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 31 papers that have together received 597 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (13 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (6 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (5 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (4 papers), Embodied and Extended Cognition (3 papers), Cognitive Science and Education Research (2 papers), Action Observation and Synchronization (2 papers) and Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (369 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (83 citations), Philosophy (203 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (201 citations) and General Psychology (12 citations). Frederick Adams has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Alfred R. Mele, Kenneth Aizawa, Arthur M. Glenberg, G. A. Fuller, Berent Enç and David Kline. Their work appears in journals such as Canadian Journal of Philosophy, The Southern Journal of Philosophy, Journal of Philosophical Research, Mind & Language and The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact