Julia Schmitt

22 papers receiving 224 citations

Peers

Julia Schmitt
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Biochemistry 16
  • Neurology 24
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 31
  • Pollution 17
  • Molecular Medicine 7
Replace Iresha Hanchapola with:
Iresha Hanchapola Australia
Yuki Saitoh Japan
Paul Howroyd United States
Stjepan Gamulin Croatia
Ellen O’Connor United States
Xiaozhi Li China
Jean-Hervé Abalain France
Jing Pi Australia
James M. Kleeman United States
Julia Schmitt relative to Iresha Hanchapola Australia Iresha Hanchapola's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Iresha Hanchapola · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Julia Schmitt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julia Schmitt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julia Schmitt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julia Schmitt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julia Schmitt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julia Schmitt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julia Schmitt. The network helps show where Julia Schmitt may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Julia Schmitt, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Julia Schmitt Line = papers co-authored together Julia Schmitt links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201752
2 196726
3 201623
4 199219
5 201219
6 202217
7 202114
8 201612
9 201610
10 19689
11 20167
12 20206
13 19646
14 20164
15 20223
16 19823
17
[Sensitivity of Bifidibacterium bifidum to 11 antibiotics].
19592
18 19751
19
[Nosographic approach of heriditary myopathies. Attempt at classification and diagnosis by means of erythrocyte cholinesterase and serum pseudocholinesterase analysis].
19761
20
[Behavior of 17 species of strictly anaerobic bacteria in relation to 11 antibiotics].
19561

About Julia Schmitt

Julia Schmitt is a scholar working on Neurology, Molecular Biology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Nutrition and Dietetics and Oncology, having authored 30 papers that have together received 242 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Streptococcal Infections and Treatments (3 papers), Neuroblastoma Research and Treatments (3 papers), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (3 papers), Trace Elements in Health (3 papers), Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus (2 papers), Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing (2 papers), Diphtheria, Corynebacterium, and Tetanus (2 papers) and Amino Acid Enzymes and Metabolism (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biochemistry (16 citations), Neurology (24 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (31 citations), Pollution (17 citations) and Molecular Medicine (7 citations). Julia Schmitt has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Meinhart H. Zenk, Mike S. M. Jetten, Claudia Lüke, Olivia Rasigraf, Eckhard Leistner, Rupert Handgretinger, Bernd J. Pichler, Markus Bischoff, Insa Joost and Stephen D. Gillies. Their work appears in journals such as Oncotarget, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, Nuclear Medicine and Biology, Human Genetics and Journal of Internal Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact