Julia Sauerbeck

15 papers receiving 270 citations

Peers

Julia Sauerbeck
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 113
  • Biological Psychiatry 8
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 68
  • Physiology 78
  • Neurology 19
Replace Denise Visser with:
Denise Visser Netherlands
Alex Whittington United Kingdom
Jing Ming Yeo United Kingdom
Masuhiro Sakata Japan
Elles Konijnenberg Netherlands
Anna E. Blanken United States
Aylin Dincer United States
Ciro Morgese United Kingdom
Anthony G. Chesebro United States
Yng Miin Loke Singapore
Julia Sauerbeck relative to Denise Visser Netherlands Denise Visser's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×20×
Denise Visser · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Julia Sauerbeck

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julia Sauerbeck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julia Sauerbeck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julia Sauerbeck more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julia Sauerbeck

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julia Sauerbeck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julia Sauerbeck. The network helps show where Julia Sauerbeck may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Julia Sauerbeck, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Julia Sauerbeck Line = papers co-authored together Julia Sauerbeck links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 2014103
2 201928
3 201827
4 201723
5 201720
6 202018
7 202114
8 202212
9 20186
10 20205
11 20235
12 20204
13 20232
14 20202
15 20181

About Julia Sauerbeck

Julia Sauerbeck is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Physiology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Surgery and Neurology, having authored 15 papers that have together received 270 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (8 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (5 papers), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (2 papers), Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (2 papers), Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (2 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (2 papers), Lanthanide and Transition Metal Complexes (1 paper) and Pneumothorax, Barotrauma, Emphysema (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (113 citations), Biological Psychiatry (8 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (68 citations), Physiology (78 citations) and Neurology (19 citations). Julia Sauerbeck has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Matthias Brendel, Axel Rominger, John Seibyl, Andreas Delker, Peter Bartenstein, Peter Bartenstein, Janusch Blautzik, Kazunari Ishii, Mathias Meyer and Gerhard Adam. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Alzheimer s Disease, Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, Annals of Nuclear Medicine, Scientific Reports and NeuroImage Clinical.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact