Julia Pugh

2.2k citations
10 papers · 240 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

    • Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments 3
    • Testicular diseases and treatments 2
    • Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research 4
    • Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment 4

Julia Pugh

10 papers receiving 238 citations

Peers

Julia Pugh
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 56
  • Nephrology 64
  • Reproductive Medicine 37
  • Surgery 97
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 64
Replace Andrese Aline Gasparin with:
Andrese Aline Gasparin Brazil
Luke Buizen Australia
Joseph Cheaib United States
Jos de Jong Netherlands
Masashi Tsunematsu Japan
Robert Armbrust Germany
Eve Miller‐Hodges United Kingdom
Francesco Savinelli France
Matthew Danzig United States
In‐Chang Cho South Korea
Julia Pugh relative to Andrese Aline Gasparin Brazil Andrese Aline Gasparin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Andrese Aline Gasparin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Julia Pugh

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julia Pugh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julia Pugh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julia Pugh more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julia Pugh

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julia Pugh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julia Pugh. The network helps show where Julia Pugh may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Julia Pugh, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Julia Pugh Line = papers co-authored together Julia Pugh links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1 201671
2 200768
3 200739
4 202019
5 202312
6 202011
7 202311
8 20206
9 20232
10 20211

About Julia Pugh

Julia Pugh is a scholar working on Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Reproductive Medicine, Nephrology and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 10 papers that have together received 240 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research (4 papers), Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (4 papers), Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments (3 papers), Endometriosis Research and Treatment (2 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (2 papers), Testicular diseases and treatments (2 papers), Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (2 papers) and Dialysis and Renal Disease Management (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (56 citations), Nephrology (64 citations), Reproductive Medicine (37 citations), Surgery (97 citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (64 citations). Julia Pugh has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Gareth Roberts, Robert Huddart, Kieron Donovan, Elizabeth Rapley, Douglas F. Easton, Darshna Dudakia, J. Coffey, D. Timothy Bishop, Michael R. Stratton and M. Sokal. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, Clinical Kidney Journal, British Journal of Cancer, British Journal of Urology and PLoS ONE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact