Julia Kaiser

29 papers receiving 848 citations

Peers

Julia Kaiser
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
  • Developmental Neuroscience 75
  • Neurology 118
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 112
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 101
  • Cancer Research 85
Replace Ming‐Fu Chiang with:
Ming‐Fu Chiang Taiwan
Paschalis Theotokis Greece
Daniel Crooks United Kingdom
David Rohde Germany
Nicola Rizzuto Italy
Helmar C. Lehmann Germany
Ana Gutierrez del Arroyo United Kingdom
Allison M. Andrews United States
Vanessa Frodermann Netherlands
Ananth K. Vellimana United States
Julia Kaiser relative to Ming‐Fu Chiang Taiwan Ming‐Fu Chiang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×
Ming‐Fu Chiang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Julia Kaiser

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julia Kaiser's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julia Kaiser with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julia Kaiser more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julia Kaiser

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julia Kaiser. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julia Kaiser. The network helps show where Julia Kaiser may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Julia Kaiser, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Julia Kaiser Line = papers co-authored together Julia Kaiser links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003184
2 2018184
3 201776
4 202251
5 201850
6 201745
7 201931
8 201628
9 201927
10 200622
11 202020
12 201719
13 202018
14 202013
15 201812
16
Blood Stasis: China's classical concept in modern medicine
200612
17 201711
18 202010
19 20209
20 20208

About Julia Kaiser

Julia Kaiser is a scholar working on Surgery, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Language and Linguistics, Molecular Biology and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 29 papers that have together received 867 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nerve injury and regeneration (4 papers), Pancreatic function and diabetes (4 papers), Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (3 papers), Adenosine and Purinergic Signaling (3 papers), Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms (3 papers), Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (3 papers), Linguistic research and analysis (3 papers) and Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (75 citations), Neurology (118 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (112 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (101 citations) and Cancer Research (85 citations). Julia Kaiser has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and United States. Frequent co-authors include Martin E. Schwab, Ruslan Rust, Thomas Klingebiel, Ursula Creutzig, Thomas Lehrnbecher, Dirk Reinhardt, Gisela Drews, Peter Krippeit‐Drews, Martina Düfer and Christian Tackenberg. Their work appears in journals such as Diabetes, Journal of Neuroscience, Nature Protocols, Frontiers in Endocrinology and Frontiers in Neuroscience.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact