Julia Irwin

1.4k citations
34 papers · 982 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Julia Irwin

33 papers receiving 937 citations

Peers

Julia Irwin
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 447
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 439
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 415
  • Sensory Systems 104
  • Pharmacy 65
Replace Tonya R. Bergeson with:
Tonya R. Bergeson United States
Rachael Frush Holt United States
Susan Rvachew Canada
Marie‐Thérèse Le Normand France
Ulrika Nettelbladt Sweden
Alison Holm Australia
Waldemar von Suchodoletz Germany
Mark VanDam United States
David J. Ertmer United States
Brittan A. Barker United States
Julia Irwin relative to Tonya R. Bergeson United States Tonya R. Bergeson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Tonya R. Bergeson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Julia Irwin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julia Irwin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julia Irwin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julia Irwin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julia Irwin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julia Irwin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julia Irwin. The network helps show where Julia Irwin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Julia Irwin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Julia Irwin Line = papers co-authored together Julia Irwin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003228
2 2008126
3 2002110
4 201199
5 201363
6 201148
7 199748
8 201436
9 200636
10 199524
11 201720
12 201420
13 200320
14 201116
15 201114
16 201713
17 201711
18 201410
19 202010
20 20215

About Julia Irwin

Julia Irwin is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Social Psychology and Pharmacy, having authored 34 papers that have together received 982 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Multisensory perception and integration (18 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (8 papers), Tactile and Sensory Interactions (6 papers), Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (5 papers), Language Development and Disorders (5 papers), Phonetics and Phonology Research (4 papers), Categorization, perception, and language (3 papers) and Infant Health and Development (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (447 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (439 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (415 citations), Sensory Systems (104 citations) and Pharmacy (65 citations). Julia Irwin has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Alice S. Carter, D. H. Whalen, Margaret J. Briggs‐Gowan, Lawrence Brancazio, Sarah McCue Horwitz, Jennifer Adams Mendoza, Catherine T. Best, Robert T. Schultz, Cheryl Klaiman and Carol A. Fowler. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Frontiers in Psychology, Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, Journal of Visualized Experiments and Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact