Julia E. Connelly

23 papers receiving 669 citations

Peers

Julia E. Connelly
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
  • Family Practice 29
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 219
  • General Health Professions 228
  • Health Information Management 33
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 181
Replace John Toews with:
John Toews Canada
John Horder United Kingdom
David Barnard United States
Jack Coulehan United States
David Hannay United Kingdom
Larry Mauksch United States
Miles F. Shore United States
Elisabeth Assing Hvidt Denmark
Shelley Raffin Bouchal Canada
Nili Tabak Israel
Julia E. Connelly relative to John Toews Canada John Toews's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
John Toews · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Julia E. Connelly

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julia E. Connelly's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julia E. Connelly with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julia E. Connelly more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julia E. Connelly

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julia E. Connelly. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julia E. Connelly. The network helps show where Julia E. Connelly may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Julia E. Connelly, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Julia E. Connelly Line = papers co-authored together Julia E. Connelly links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1995169
2 1989153
3 199660
4 199053
5 200544
6 199143
7 199139
8 199938
9 198836
10 198717
11 199113
12 200312
13 199212
14 199212
15 20099
16 20048
17 19907
18 19996
19 19866
20 19876

About Julia E. Connelly

Julia E. Connelly is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Psychiatry and Mental health, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Health Information Management and Clinical Psychology, having authored 24 papers that have together received 753 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Empathy and Medical Education (7 papers), Ethics in medical practice (3 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (3 papers), Global Health Workforce Issues (2 papers), Film in Education and Therapy (2 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Health Research (1 paper), Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia and Thrombosis (1 paper) and Primary Care and Health Outcomes (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (29 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (219 citations), General Health Professions (228 citations), Health Information Management (33 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (181 citations). Julia E. Connelly has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Vietnam. Frequent co-authors include John T. Philbrick, G. Richard Smith, Donald L. Kaiser, Antoinette Wymer, Kerr L. White, Kathryn Montgomery Hunter, Joanne Trautmann Banks, Anne Hudson Jones, Martha Montello and Anne Hunsaker Hawkins. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of General Internal Medicine, Perspectives in biology and medicine, Annals of Internal Medicine, The American Journal of the Medical Sciences and JAMA.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact