Julia Doljansky

976 citations
13 papers · 815 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Julia Doljansky

13 papers receiving 784 citations

Peers

Julia Doljansky
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 430
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 195
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 227
  • Clinical Psychology 216
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 61
Replace X. An with:
X. An United States
Dominic T. Cheng United States
Anushka Fernando United Kingdom
Scott J. Woodley United States
Jaquette Liljencrantz Sweden
Tilman Hensch Germany
Sara V. Tupak Germany
Terence V. Sewards United States
Roberto Goya‐Maldonado Germany
Helena Backlund Sweden
Julia Doljansky relative to X. An United States X. An's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.7×
X. An · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Julia Doljansky

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julia Doljansky's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julia Doljansky with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julia Doljansky more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julia Doljansky

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julia Doljansky. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julia Doljansky. The network helps show where Julia Doljansky may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Julia Doljansky, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Julia Doljansky Line = papers co-authored together Julia Doljansky links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 2007322
2 200368
3 200966
4 200660
5 200557
6 200454
7 200452
8 200640
9 200135
10 200132
11 200519
12
Daytime sleep condenses the time course of motor memory consolidation. Nat Neurosci
20077
13
[A chronobiological approach in treatment of sleep disturbances in Alzheimer's dementia patients].
20063

About Julia Doljansky

Julia Doljansky is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Molecular Biology, having authored 13 papers that have together received 815 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (6 papers), Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (5 papers), Sleep and related disorders (3 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (3 papers), Sleep and Wakefulness Research (3 papers), Circadian rhythm and melatonin (2 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (2 papers) and Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (430 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (195 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (227 citations), Clinical Psychology (216 citations) and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (61 citations). Julia Doljansky has collaborated with scholars based in Israel and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Yaron Dagan, Daphna Joel, Julie Carrier, Avi Karni, Maria Korman, Julien Doyon, Amit Green, Daniela Schiller, Moshe Rehavi and Yonatan Lahav. Their work appears in journals such as Chronobiology International, Behavioral Neuroscience, Neuroscience, Neuropsychopharmacology and Behavioural Pharmacology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact