J.P. Boudou

1.9k citations
36 papers · 1.6k · h-index 22

Impact in

Papers in

J.P. Boudou

36 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

J.P. Boudou
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Fuel Technology 32
  • Geochemistry and Petrology 147
  • Mechanics of Materials 394
  • Materials Chemistry 729
  • Analytical Chemistry 120
Replace H. Freund with:
H. Freund Germany
Clifford L. Spiro United States
Michael Sansone United States
Jean‐Paul Boudou France
G.H. Taylor Australia
P. Dhamelincourt France
Randy W. Snyder United States
P. J. Kwiatek United States
Zdeněk Weiss Czechia
Hiroshi Mori Japan
J.P. Boudou relative to H. Freund Germany H. Freund's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
H. Freund · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by J.P. Boudou

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J.P. Boudou's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J.P. Boudou with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J.P. Boudou more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J.P. Boudou

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J.P. Boudou. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J.P. Boudou. The network helps show where J.P. Boudou may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside J.P. Boudou, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with J.P. Boudou Line = papers co-authored together J.P. Boudou links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2002180
2 2007168
3 2003147
4 1998127
5 200398
6 200596
7 200674
8 200067
9 198761
10 198355
11 200351
12 200649
13 199846
14 201544
15 199536
16 199335
17 199732
18 199429
19 199428
20 198628

About J.P. Boudou

J.P. Boudou is a scholar working on Materials Chemistry, Mechanics of Materials, Biomedical Engineering, Ocean Engineering and Analytical Chemistry, having authored 36 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis (12 papers), Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research (9 papers), Coal Properties and Utilization (7 papers), Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes (7 papers), Petroleum Processing and Analysis (5 papers), Carbon Nanotubes in Composites (5 papers), Coal and Coke Industries Research (3 papers) and Coal and Its By-products (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Fuel Technology (32 citations), Geochemistry and Petrology (147 citations), Mechanics of Materials (394 citations), Materials Chemistry (729 citations) and Analytical Chemistry (120 citations). J.P. Boudou has collaborated with scholars based in France, Poland and Russia. Frequent co-authors include J.M.D. Tascón, J. Bimer, A. Martı́nez-Alonso, Ana Cuesta, J.I. Paredes, Mohamed M. Chehimi, R. P. Suggate, K. Mark Thomas, Bo Xiao and T. Siemieniewska. Their work appears in journals such as Carbon, Fuel, Energy & Fuels, Organic Geochemistry and Journal of Petroleum Geology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact