Countries where authors publish in Organic Geochemistry
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Organic Geochemistry. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Organic Geochemistry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Organic Geochemistry more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Organic Geochemistry
This network shows the impact of papers published in Organic Geochemistry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Organic Geochemistry.
About Organic Geochemistry
The 5.3k papers published in Organic Geochemistry in the last decades have received a total of 267.7k indexed citations . Papers published in Organic Geochemistry usually cover Analytical Chemistry (1.3k papers), Mechanics of Materials (3.1k papers), Environmental Chemistry (941 papers), Geology (470 papers) and Geochemistry and Petrology (390 papers) specifically the topics of Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis (3.1k papers), Petroleum Processing and Analysis (1.3k papers), Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (1.0k papers), Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics (894 papers), Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena (795 papers), Isotope Analysis in Ecology (701 papers), Marine and coastal ecosystems (599 papers) and Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping (538 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Organic Geochemistry are Philip A. Meyers, John K. Volkman, Jaap S. Sinninghe Damsté, Keith A. Kvenvolden, Patrick G. Hatcher, Stefan Schouten, J.W. de Leeuw, Kenneth E. Peters, Claude Largeau and L R Snowdon.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.